
Why: limited usage
vs DEN: allows 16.9 PPR/g to RB, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
No availability flags or recent headlines.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 12 | 56 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 53% | 13% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 14% | 20% | 9.5 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 18% | 5% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | 0.1 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 0.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 19% | 9% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 17% | 7% | 2.8 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 3% | 0.7 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 14 | 39 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 42 | 0 | 35% | 15% | 13.1 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 9% | 14% | 5.1 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 9% | 8% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 4 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 26% | 11% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 2 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11% | 3% | 1.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 3% | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.6 | RB28 (7.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 0.2 | RB22 (9.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 2.0 | RB64 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 3.1 | RB76 (0.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.2 | RB66 (0.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.5 | RB94 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 5.7 | RB34 (6.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 5.3 | RB54 (2.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.2 | RB60 (0.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.4 | RB59 (0.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade