Loading…
Chimere Dike
WR · TEN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
20.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs NYJ: allows 30.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 18/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs NYJ
contextNo prior games vs NYJ in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %72%
Target share12%
Opportunities4
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
103Easy
#7 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
111Easy
#2 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
103Easy
#7 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- Copy of Could an NFL roster of only bench players be compe...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
- Offseason report cards for all 32 NFL teams: Our g...www.espn.com · 2026-06-30
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ JAX | 4 | 3 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 72% | 12% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vs NO | 5 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 78% | 14% | 10.2 |
| 2025 W16 | vs KC | 5 | 3 | 40 | 1 | – | – | 59% | 19% | 13.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ SF | 5 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 1 | -7 | 70% | 19% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ CLE | 8 | 5 | 24 | 1 | – | – | 67% | 32% | 13.4 |
| 2025 W13 | vsJAX | 4 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 76% | 11% | -0.1 |
| 2025 W12 | vs SEA | 7 | 5 | 44 | 1 | – | – | 80% | 18% | 15.4 |
| 2025 W11 | vs HOU | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | – | – | 27% | 8% | 3.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs LAC | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 14% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W8 | @ IND | 8 | 7 | 93 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 89% | 22% | 16.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vs NE | 4 | 4 | 70 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 57% | 13% | 16.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ LV | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 9% | 2.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @ ARI | 5 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 14% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W4 | @HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 40% | 0% | -0.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vsIND | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 41% | 12% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W2 | vs LAR | 5 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 42% | 16% | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ DEN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 18% | 4% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim67%hit rate
15 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 0%
of 1 Flex call
🔴 71%
of 14 Sit calls
Based on 15 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | JAX | FLEX | 9.8 | WR50 (5.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | NO | SIT | 9.1 | WR34 (10.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | KC | SIT | 9.4 | WR26 (13.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | SF | SIT | 8.2 | WR69 (5.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | CLE | SIT | 6.4 | WR19 (13.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | JAX | SIT | 8.7 | WR158 (-0.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | SEA | SIT | 7.7 | WR18 (15.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | HOU | SIT | 8.1 | WR72 (3.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | LAC | SIT | 8.2 | WR89 (1.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | IND | SIT | 5.2 | WR14 (16.4) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade