




vs CAR: allows 27.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 23/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jordan Love. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (278/452). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR46), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W9 | vs | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Watson and Matthew Golden have been the primary wide receivers for Green Bay this season. - Green Bay wide receiver Matthew Golden didn't practice on Monday and Tuesday with shoulder and foot injuries but was limited in practice on Wednesda
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | @ | 12 | 6 | 39 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 29% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | vs | 13 | 6 | 104 | 1 | – | – | 84% | 33% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | vs | 7 | 6 | 123 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | @ | 7 | 3 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 88% | 23% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vs | 12 | 5 | 100 | 1 | – | – | 82% | 24% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | @ | 6 | 4 | 58 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @ | 12 | 6 | 95 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 30% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 30% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 1 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 12% | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 31% | 4% | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 4 | 3 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 35% | 11% | 8.5 | 7.0 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 3 | 1 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 35% | 12% | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 37% | 9% | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 9% | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 4 | 4 | 37 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 14% | 7.7 | 5.7 | 3.7 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 5 | 3 | 86 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 69% | 19% | 13.2 | 11.7 | 10.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 6 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 59% | 17% | 11.3 | 8.8 | 6.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.