Loading…
Colston Loveland
TE · CHI
START
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
24.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs CAR: allows 13.6 PPR/g to TE, rank 15/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs CAR
contextNo prior games vs CAR in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %91%
Target share45%
Opportunities13
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
94Hard
#32 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
82Hard
#29 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
94Hard
#32 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Cleveland Browns 2026 preview: Todd Monken takes over rebuilt offense and a defense without Myles Garrettwww.pff.com · 2026-07-28
- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- Dart, Tate and others primed to follow path of 202...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- PFF Tight End Rankings: The top 32 players ahead of the 2026 NFL seasonwww.pff.com · 2026-07-22
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs DET | 13 | 10 | 91 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 45% | 25.1 |
| 2025 W17 | @ SF | 10 | 6 | 94 | 1 | – | – | 82% | 26% | 21.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs GB | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 17% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs CLE | 5 | 4 | 63 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 65% | 19% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @GB | 5 | 4 | 29 | 1 | – | – | 59% | 18% | 12.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @ PHI | 6 | 3 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 19% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W12 | vs PIT | 5 | 4 | 49 | 1 | – | – | 65% | 17% | 14.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ MIN | 4 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 14% | 7.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs NYG | 4 | 4 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 11% | 9.5 |
| 2025 W9 | @ CIN | 7 | 6 | 118 | 2 | – | – | 81% | 21% | 29.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ BAL | 5 | 3 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 14% | 6.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs NO | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 16% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W6 | @ WSH | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 10% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W3 | vs DAL | 3 | 1 | 31 | 0 | – | – | 10% | 11% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @DET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 3% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vsMIN | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 6% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim64%hit rate
14 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 100%
of 1 Start call
🟡 40%
of 5 Flex calls
🔴 75%
of 8 Sit calls
Based on 14 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | DET | START | 10.5 | TE1 (25.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | SF | FLEX | 8.8 | TE2 (21.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | GB | FLEX | 9.0 | TE23 (6.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | CLE | SIT | 8.6 | TE16 (10.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | GB | SIT | 7.9 | TE9 (12.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | PHI | FLEX | 9.4 | TE29 (5.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W12 | PIT | FLEX | 9.4 | TE3 (14.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | MIN | FLEX | 9.2 | TE17 (7.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | NYG | SIT | 8.6 | TE14 (9.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | CIN | SIT | 6.4 | TE2 (29.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade