





vs SEA: allows 14.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 10/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Caleb Williams. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (135/529). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE3), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs SEA in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Chicago Bears Tight end Colston Loveland impressed last season and is ready for an expanded role in Year 2.
source ↗Williams, the Bears starting quarterback who has been out since suffering a hamstring injury in Week 2, looked as healthy as ever on his first drive today against the Falcons, marching the Bears’ offense down the field on a 10-play, 67-yard
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | vs | 12 | 7 | 69 | 1 | – | – | 84% | 40% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | @ | 7 | 6 | 65 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | @ | 5 | 2 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 13% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | vs | 9 | 6 | 57 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 29% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vs | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 12% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vs | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 10% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 8% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 13 | 10 | 91 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 45% | 25.1 | 20.1 | 15.1 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 10 | 6 | 94 | 1 | – | – | 82% | 26% | 21.4 | 18.4 | 15.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 17% | 6.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 5 | 4 | 63 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 65% | 19% | 10.1 | 8.1 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 5 | 4 | 29 | 1 | – | – | 59% | 18% | 12.9 | 10.9 | 8.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 6 | 3 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 19% | 5.8 | 4.3 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 5 | 4 | 49 | 1 | – | – | 65% | 17% | 14.9 | 12.9 | 10.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 4 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 14% | 7.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 4 | 4 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 11% | 9.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 7 | 6 | 118 | 2 | – | – | 81% | 21% | 29.8 | 26.8 | 23.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 5 | 3 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 14% | 6.8 | 5.3 | 3.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.