Loading…
Colston Loveland
TE · CHI
START
upcoming
2026 Week 2
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup
2026 Wk 2
Reads
analysis
PLAYER OUTLOOK
Caleb Williams Fantasy 2026: Is the Bears QB a Breakout at a QB7 Price?
FFMatchup · Sep 9, 2026
DRAFT STRATEGY
Positional scarcity 2026: where to invest early and where to wait
FFMatchup · Aug 24, 2026
PLAYER OUTLOOK
Colston Loveland Fantasy 2026: Is the Bears Rookie TE a TE1 at a TE3 Price?
FFMatchup · Aug 24, 2026
PLAYER OUTLOOK
Rome Odunze Fantasy 2026: A Breakout Bet on a 28% Air-Yards Share
FFMatchup · Aug 5, 2026
TIGHT END DEEP DIVE
Caleb Williams and Colston Loveland: The Chemistry Is Real
FFMatchup · Jul 23, 2026
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
–
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs MIN: allows 10.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 27/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
CHI targets to TE
BoostCHI routes 26% of pass targets to TE this season (34% over the trailing 8 wk), +1.5 SD vs the league TE average.
Primary passer Caleb Williams. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (135/529). Descriptive context, never a model input.
Draft outlook
contextProj12.8TE3
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE3), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
History vs MIN
contextvs MIN: 2 games, 5.1 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %0%
Target share8%
Opportunities2
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
93Hard
#31 of 32 · 16 games
Fantasy playoffs
82Hard
#29 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
94Hard
#32 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
contextrole changesnaps ↑
Chicago Bears Tight end Colston Loveland impressed last season and is ready for an expanded role in Year 2.
source ↗role changesnaps ↑
Chicago Bears Tight end Colston Loveland impressed last season and is ready for an expanded role in Year 2.
source ↗- 2026 NFL Power Rankings: Week 2nfltraderumors.co · 2026-09-15
- Four NFL offenses that went off Sunday: Barnwell makes sense of the Bears, Ravens, Bills and Jagswww.espn.com · 2026-09-14
- NFL Week 1 Recap: Immediate fantasy football takeaways from Sunday’s gameswww.pff.com · 2026-09-13
- What to know from Sunday's Week 1 games -- starting with the Bills dismantling the Texans' defensewww.espn.com · 2026-09-13
- Five things to watch as Panthers kick off the season against the Bearswww.panthers.com · 2026-09-12
Game log
context2025 by week
Fantasy points, matchups, and our calls
10.3 PPR/g · best 29.8
3
1
0
2
4
✓
3
3
✓
6
5
✓
7
7
✓
8
30
✗
9
10
✓
10
7
✗
11
15
✓
12
6
✗
13
13
✗
14
10
✓
15
6
✗
16
21
✓
17
25
✓
18
Fantasy playoffs · W15–1712.5 PPR/g over 3 gamesabove their 10.3 season averageour calls: 2/3 hit
Our weekly call: Start Flex Sit✓ hit ✗ miss playoff weeks
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ CAR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 8% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vsDET | 13 | 10 | 91 | 1 | – | – | 91% | 45% | 25.1 | 20.1 | 15.1 |
| 2025 W17 | @SF | 10 | 6 | 94 | 1 | – | – | 82% | 26% | 21.4 | 18.4 | 15.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vsGB | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 17% | 6.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vsCLE | 5 | 4 | 63 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 65% | 19% | 10.1 | 8.1 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @GB | 5 | 4 | 29 | 1 | – | – | 59% | 18% | 12.9 | 10.9 | 8.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @PHI | 6 | 3 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 19% | 5.8 | 4.3 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W12 | vsPIT | 5 | 4 | 49 | 1 | – | – | 65% | 17% | 14.9 | 12.9 | 10.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @MIN | 4 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 14% | 7.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vsNYG | 4 | 4 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 62% | 11% | 9.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W9 | @CIN | 7 | 6 | 118 | 2 | – | – | 81% | 21% | 29.8 | 26.8 | 23.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @BAL | 5 | 3 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 14% | 6.8 | 5.3 | 3.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vsNO | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 16% | 5.4 | 3.9 | 2.4 |
| 2025 W6 | @WSH | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 10% | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W3 | vsDAL | 3 | 1 | 31 | 0 | – | – | 10% | 11% | 4.1 | 3.6 | 3.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @DET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 3% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | vsMIN | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 6% | – | – | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Accuracy
our claim64%hit rate
14 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 100%
of 1 Start call
🟡 40%
of 5 Flex calls
🔴 75%
of 8 Sit calls
Based on 14 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | DET | START | 10.5 | TE1 (25.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | SF | FLEX | 8.8 | TE2 (21.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | GB | FLEX | 9.0 | TE23 (6.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | CLE | SIT | 8.6 | TE16 (10.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | GB | SIT | 7.9 | TE9 (12.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | PHI | FLEX | 9.4 | TE29 (5.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W12 | PIT | FLEX | 9.4 | TE3 (14.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | MIN | FLEX | 9.2 | TE17 (7.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | NYG | SIT | 8.6 | TE14 (9.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | CIN | SIT | 6.4 | TE2 (29.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade