
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs CIN: allows 25.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer C.J. Stroud. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (345/551). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR78), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs CIN in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Last season, Houston had Nico Collins as its X receiver, Higgins and Xavier Hutchinson in a rotation as the Z receiver and Christian Kirk in a rotation with Jaylin Noel in the slot.
source ↗Last season, Houston had Nico Collins as its X receiver, Higgins and Xavier Hutchinson in a rotation as the Z receiver and Christian Kirk in a rotation with Jaylin Noel in the slot.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 2 | 2 | 53 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 5% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 16% | 4% | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 4 | 3 | 54 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25% | 15% | 14.6 | 13.1 | 11.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 14% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 16% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 36% | 7% | 3.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 24% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 29% | 7% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 26% | 3% | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 4 | 4 | 35 | 0 | – | – | 33% | 9% | 7.5 | 5.5 | 3.5 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 15% | 0% | -0.3 | -0.3 | -0.3 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 6 | 5 | 63 | 0 | – | – | 39% | 16% | 11.3 | 8.8 | 6.3 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 7 | 4 | 77 | 0 | – | – | 43% | 15% | 11.7 | 9.7 | 7.7 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 3 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 30% | 10% | 9.8 | 8.8 | 7.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 24% | 4% | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 14% | 3% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 31% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 27% | 7% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 3.7 | WR82 (2.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 1.5 | WR18 (14.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 3.1 | WR153 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 3.4 | WR150 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.0 | WR74 (3.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 3.0 | WR148 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 4.1 | WR86 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.1 | WR85 (2.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.0 | WR43 (7.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.6 | WR145 (-0.3) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade