Loading…
Isaiah Bond
WR · CLE
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage, low total
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
16.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs JAX: allows 31.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 16/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs JAX
contextNo prior games vs JAX in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %54%
Target share10%
Opportunities3
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
102Easy
#9 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
113Easy
#1 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
102Easy
#9 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Shedeur Sanders on QB battle with Deshaun Watson: We’re both trying to be the best version of ourselveswww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-20
- 2026 NFL Trade Block: Post June Updatenfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-19
- Buzz: Major breakout incoming? Why Rashid Shaheed ...www.espn.com · 2026-06-29
- KC Concepcion thinks the Browns' wide receiver group can be dangerouswww.nbcsports.com · 2026-06-29
- 32 teams, 32 surprises: Which players stood out on...www.espn.com · 2026-06-22
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ CIN | 2 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 54% | 10% | 2.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vs PIT | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | – | – | 23% | 4% | 2.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs BUF | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 48% | 0% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ CHI | 4 | 2 | 89 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 13% | 10.9 |
| 2025 W14 | vs TEN | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 48% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs SF | 2 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 29% | 9% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W12 | @ LV | 2 | 2 | 58 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 11% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W11 | vs BAL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 42% | 4% | 0.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ NE | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 12% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @PIT | 5 | 2 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 10% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W5 | vs MIN | 7 | 2 | 29 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 22% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ DET | 6 | 3 | 58 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 18% | 8.8 |
| 2025 W3 | vs GB | 4 | 2 | 16 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 13% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @BAL | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 38% | 7% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vsCIN | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 28% | 2% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
14 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 14 Sit calls
Based on 14 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | CIN | SIT | 3.8 | WR78 (2.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | PIT | SIT | 3.9 | WR89 (2.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | BUF | SIT | 4.6 | WR100 (2.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | CHI | SIT | 3.3 | WR36 (10.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | TEN | SIT | 4.1 | WR143 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | SF | SIT | 3.0 | WR77 (3.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | LV | SIT | 3.5 | WR41 (7.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | BAL | SIT | 4.9 | WR103 (0.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | NE | SIT | 6.0 | WR132 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | MIA | SIT | 7.4 | WR148 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade