Loading…
Dont'e Thornton Jr.
WR · LV
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs MIA: allows 29.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 19/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs MIA
contextNo prior games vs MIA in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %13%
Target share4%
Opportunities1
Signal · descriptiveOpportunity rising, production lagging (last-3-week opportunities up vs the prior three while fantasy output hasn’t followed. Often a buy-low pattern.)
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 15.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
95Hard
#32 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
101Average
#14 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
95Hard
#32 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Big questions ahead of Raiders' training camp: Wha...www.espn.com · 2026-07-28
- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- 2026 Fantasy Football: Late-round sleepers to target in draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-21
- Better, worse or the same? Examining the Raiders' ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-18
- Eight new NFL coach-player pairings Solak can't wa...www.espn.com · 2026-07-14
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs KC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs NYG | 4 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 78% | 14% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W16 | @ HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ LAC | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 29% | 9% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W12 | vs CLE | 2 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 38% | 5% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W11 | vs DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ DEN | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 62% | 8% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @KC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86% | 18% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs TEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ IND | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47% | 6% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CHI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60% | 10% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ WSH | 4 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 59% | 15% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W2 | vsLAC | 4 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 81% | 9% | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ NE | 4 | 2 | 45 | 0 | 60% | 12% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
13 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 13 Sit calls
Based on 13 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | KC | SIT | 2.3 | WR140 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | NYG | SIT | 1.7 | WR84 (3.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | HOU | SIT | 1.2 | WR151 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | PHI | SIT | 2.2 | WR145 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | LAC | SIT | 3.2 | WR93 (2.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | CLE | SIT | 2.8 | WR80 (2.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | DAL | SIT | 3.7 | WR135 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | DEN | SIT | 3.0 | WR86 (1.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | KC | SIT | 2.9 | WR136 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W6 | TEN | SIT | 5.3 | WR134 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade