
Why: OUT · INJ gate
vs CIN: allows 25.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer C.J. Stroud. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (345/551). Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs CIN in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
The Texans adjust without Jayden Higgins: Their up-and-coming second-year wide receiver tore his ACL in practice and will miss the season.
source ↗Texans Houston traded for WR Kayshon Boutte to step into a regular role after losing WR Jayden Higgins to a season-ending injury.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 5 | 2 | 23 | 1 | 81% | 18% | 10.3 | 9.3 | 8.3 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 4 | 2 | 88 | 1 | 49% | 15% | 16.8 | 15.8 | 14.8 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 3 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 54% | 9% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 72% | 4% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 5 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 60% | 19% | 6.4 | 4.9 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 5 | 5 | 65 | 0 | 58% | 16% | 11.5 | 9.0 | 6.5 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 9 | 4 | 38 | 1 | 58% | 32% | 13.8 | 11.8 | 9.8 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 7 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 61% | 18% | 9.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 7 | 5 | 42 | 1 | 57% | 16% | 15.2 | 12.7 | 10.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 48% | 3% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 8 | 4 | 34 | 1 | 83% | 21% | 13.4 | 11.4 | 9.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63% | 7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 4 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 56% | 13% | 7.2 | 5.2 | 3.2 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 1 | 1 | 24 | 1 | 44% | 4% | 9.4 | 8.9 | 8.4 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 44% | 3% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 1 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 43% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 3 | 2 | 32 | 0 | 43% | 11% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 6.8 | WR26 (10.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 6.2 | WR11 (16.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 9.2 | WR91 (2.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 10.5 | WR99 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 10.3 | WR48 (6.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 9.0 | WR26 (11.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 8.5 | WR23 (13.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 7.4 | WR35 (9.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.3 | WR21 (15.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 7.0 | WR90 (1.4) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade