Loading…
Gage Larvadain
WR · CLE
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage, low total
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
16.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs JAX: allows 31.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 16/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs JAX
contextNo prior games vs JAX in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %8%
Target share0%
Opportunities0
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 13.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
102Easy
#9 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
113Easy
#1 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
102Easy
#9 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- AFC Notes: KC Concepcion, Malaki Starks, Nate Wiggins, Bengals, Browns, Ravensnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-13
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 8% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 8% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 8% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ CHI | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 7% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs TEN | 3 | 2 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 8% | 3.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs SF | 3 | 2 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 13% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ LV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 25% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs BAL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 7% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ NYJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 25% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ NE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 52% | 0% | 0.3 |
| 2025 W7 | vs MIA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 32% | 6% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @PIT | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 16% | 8% | – |
| 2025 W5 | vs MIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 1% | 0% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
11 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 11 Sit calls
Based on 11 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | CIN | SIT | 2.0 | WR151 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | PIT | SIT | 2.7 | WR156 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | BUF | SIT | 2.8 | WR160 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | CHI | SIT | 2.2 | WR93 (1.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | TEN | SIT | 1.6 | WR66 (3.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | SF | SIT | 0.6 | WR89 (2.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | LV | SIT | 1.1 | WR136 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | BAL | SIT | 1.7 | WR147 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | NYJ | SIT | 1.9 | WR141 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | NE | SIT | 1.7 | WR94 (0.3) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade