Loading…
Tyquan Thornton
WR · KC
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.6
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs DEN: allows 26.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 25/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs DEN
contextvs DEN: 2 games, 5.0 PPR avg (1 as NE, 1 as KC)
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %51%
Target share10%
Opportunities3
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#25 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
97Average
#21 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#25 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Mahomes fully cleared for camp, feeling 'amazing'www.espn.com · 2026-07-24
- Ten 2026 NFL Draft Day 3 Sleepers To Knownfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-12
- How the Chiefs' cornerback competition became trai...www.espn.com · 2026-07-04
- Do or die at training camp: Five NFL players who must impress or risk being cutwww.yardbarker.com · 2026-06-23
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W15 | vs LAC | 3 | 2 | 47 | 0 | 51% | 10% | 6.7 |
| 2025 W14 | vs HOU | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 30% | 10% | 3.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @ DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs IND | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 2% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ DEN | 2 | 1 | 61 | 0 | 23% | 5% | 7.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ BUF | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs WSH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs LV | 2 | 1 | 39 | 0 | 33% | 6% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W6 | vs DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ JAX | 5 | 3 | 90 | 0 | 45% | 13% | 12.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs BAL | 2 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 34% | 6% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ NYG | 9 | 5 | 71 | 1 | 76% | 26% | 18.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vs PHI | 5 | 2 | 59 | 1 | 75% | 17% | 13.9 |
| 2025 W1 | @LAC | 4 | 2 | 41 | 0 | 72% | 11% | 6.1 |
| 2024 W8 | vs NYJ | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 18% | 10% | 4.0 |
| 2024 W5 | vs MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W4 | @ SF | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W3 | @NYJ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 4% | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim95%hit rate
20 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 95%
of 20 Sit calls
Based on 20 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W15 | LAC | SIT | 3.0 | WR56 (6.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | HOU | SIT | 2.2 | WR65 (3.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | DAL | SIT | 2.7 | WR131 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | IND | SIT | 3.1 | WR117 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | DEN | SIT | 2.0 | WR48 (7.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | BUF | SIT | 4.0 | WR121 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | WSH | SIT | 5.4 | WR113 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | LV | SIT | 7.8 | WR64 (4.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W6 | DET | SIT | 10.1 | WR120 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W5 | JAX | SIT | 9.5 | WR31 (12.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade