
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs CIN: allows 25.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer C.J. Stroud. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (345/551). Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs CIN in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 2 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 45% | 6% | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 9 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 67% | 21% | 4.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 6 | 2 | 29 | 1 | 74% | 18% | 10.9 | 9.9 | 8.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 2 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 25% | 4% | 3.7 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 15% | 9% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 1 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 14% | 2% | 8.3 | 7.8 | 7.3 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2023 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 17 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.5 | WR147 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 4.9 | WR152 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 6.4 | WR155 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 5.4 | WR89 (2.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 6.0 | WR140 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 3.7 | WR73 (4.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 1.2 | WR30 (10.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 1.2 | WR141 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 0.8 | WR66 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 1.4 | WR129 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade