
Why: high-scoring game
vs CLE: allows 26.0 PPR/g to WR, rank 29/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 9 | 5 | 87 | 1 | – | – | 74% | 29% | 19.7 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 10 | 8 | 115 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 81% | 27% | 19.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 10 | 6 | 145 | 1 | – | – | 56% | 29% | 26.5 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 3 | 3 | 53 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 11% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 3 | 1 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 12% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 7 | 5 | 71 | 1 | – | – | 84% | 23% | 18.1 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 9% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 7 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 2 | -4 | 87% | 30% | 11.9 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 9 | 8 | 90 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 27% | 17.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 10 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 88% | 21% | 10.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 4 | 2 | 29 | 0 | – | – | 33% | 10% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 3 | 2 | 16 | 1 | – | – | 26% | 12% | 9.6 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 85% | 7% | -0.1 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 11 | 4 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 29% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 5 | 5 | 76 | 0 | – | – | 24% | 12% | 12.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 4 | 2 | 15 | 1 | – | – | 86% | 13% | 9.5 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 3 | 3 | 31 | 1 | – | – | 83% | 14% | 12.1 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 11.7 | WR7 (19.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 10.8 | WR9 (19.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 7.6 | WR3 (26.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 10.0 | WR48 (8.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 12.1 | WR78 (3.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 12.1 | WR11 (18.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 11.5 | WR66 (4.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.4 | WR31 (11.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 7.5 | WR17 (17.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 7.1 | WR31 (10.2) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade