Loading…
Tre' Harris
WR · LAC
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
28.4
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs ARI: allows 30.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 17/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs ARI
contextNo prior games vs ARI in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %97%
Target share16%
Opportunities6
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#27 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
98Average
#18 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#27 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Dart, Tate and others primed to follow path of 202...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- Fantasy Football 2026: Quarterbacks who could finish No. 1 overallwww.pff.com · 2026-07-10
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ DEN | 6 | 2 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 16% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W17 | vs HOU | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 46% | 3% | 2.5 |
| 2025 W16 | @ DAL | 5 | 4 | 54 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 18% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ KC | 5 | 3 | 49 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 22% | 7.9 |
| 2025 W14 | vs PHI | 2 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 50% | 9% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs LV | 4 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 19% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ JAX | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 52% | 4% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs PIT | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 6% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ TEN | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 7% | 3.8 |
| 2025 W8 | vs MIN | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | – | – | 59% | 8% | 8.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs IND | 2 | 2 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 43% | 4% | 4.3 |
| 2025 W6 | @ MIA | 5 | 4 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 13% | 6.7 |
| 2025 W5 | vs WSH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 37% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ NYG | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 19% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vsDEN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 2% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @LV | 3 | 2 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 31% | 11% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vsKC | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 8% | 3% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
15 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 15 Sit calls
Based on 15 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | DEN | SIT | 5.5 | WR59 (4.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | HOU | SIT | 7.5 | WR91 (2.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | DAL | SIT | 6.7 | WR41 (9.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | KC | SIT | 4.4 | WR51 (7.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | PHI | SIT | 4.6 | WR77 (3.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | LV | SIT | 4.8 | WR56 (6.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | JAX | SIT | 4.7 | WR86 (2.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | PIT | SIT | 5.9 | WR79 (2.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | TEN | SIT | 5.5 | WR64 (3.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | MIN | SIT | 4.0 | WR45 (8.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade