
Why: limited usage, low total
vs JAX: allows 31.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 16/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs JAX in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
No availability flags or recent headlines.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 42% | 10% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 4% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 4 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 45% | 15% | 6.1 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | – | – | 26% | 3% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 0.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 37% | 0% | 0.9 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 25% | 6% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 8% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 32 | 27% | 3% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 7% | 0% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 23% | 11% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 17% | 0% | 1.1 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 60% | 5% | 0.8 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | – | – | 24% | 3% | 2.0 |
| 2024 W10 | @ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 28% | 6% | 1.2 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 10% | 0% | -0.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 20 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 3.0 | WR49 (5.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 2.4 | WR112 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 1.2 | WR63 (6.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 1.5 | WR91 (2.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 2.6 | WR100 (0.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 2.1 | WR104 (0.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 2.6 | WR91 (1.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 1.6 | WR77 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 1.5 | WR69 (3.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 0.9 | WR73 (3.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade