Insights

Research any player, explore trends.

Weekly Draft Role change Reliable starts Rookies Schedule

▾▾

133 players · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Status	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why	Finish
TE	Trey McBride ARI · TE	@NYG		15.9	–	1	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math20.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 30% Snap share 95% Opp-weighted DvP 20.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	10.1 (TE19)
TE	Kyle Pitts Sr. ATL · TE	@NO		13.8	–	2	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math17.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 23% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 17.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.7 (TE25)
TE	George Kittle SF · TE	vsDEN		13.5	–	3	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math22.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 23% Snap share 85% Opp-weighted DvP 22.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	17.0 (TE4)
TE	Colston Loveland CHI · TE	vsNYJ		13.2	–	4	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math17.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 21% Snap share 80% Opp-weighted DvP 17.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.7 (TE14)
TE	Harold Fannin Jr. CLE · TE	vsPIT		12.9	–	5	soft matchup Matchup math19.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 19% Snap share 74% Opp-weighted DvP 19.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.7 (TE15)
TE	Dallas Goedert PHI · TE	vsLAR		12.4	–	6	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math21.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 84% Opp-weighted DvP 21.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Brock Bowers LV · TE	vsKC		11.8	–	7	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math19.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 97% Opp-weighted DvP 19.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	20.6 (TE3)
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	@LV		11.2	–	8	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math17.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 89% Opp-weighted DvP 17.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.5 (TE30)
TE	Tucker Kraft GB · TE	@TB		11.1	–	9	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 81% Opp-weighted DvP 16.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.5 (TE6)
TE	Tyler Warren IND · TE	@WSH		10.9	–	10	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math16.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 19% Snap share 85% Opp-weighted DvP 16.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.1 (TE21)
TE	Sam LaPorta DET · TE	@CAR		10.7	–	11	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 13.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	22.4 (TE2)
TE	Zach Ertz PHI · TE	vsLAR		10.6	–	12	soft matchup Matchup math16.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 73% Opp-weighted DvP 16.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE32)
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	vsDAL		10.2	–	13	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math10.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 10.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.9 (TE37)
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	@PHI	Q	10.1	–	14	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math9.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 84% Opp-weighted DvP 9.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Chig Okonkwo WSH · TE	vsIND		10.0	–	15	soft matchup Matchup math12.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 58% Opp-weighted DvP 12.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.5 (TE38)
TE	Brenton Strange JAX · TE	@CIN		9.5	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math15.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 75% Opp-weighted DvP 15.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.5 (TE5)
TE	Cade Otton TB · TE	vsGB		9.3	–	17	projected outside startable range Matchup math13.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 13.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.7 (TE24)
TE	Theo Johnson NYG · TE	vsARI		9.1	–	18	projected outside startable range Matchup math13.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 88% Opp-weighted DvP 13.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.1 (TE23)
TE	Mason Taylor NYJ · TE	@CHI		8.8	–	19	projected outside startable range Matchup math11.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 78% Opp-weighted DvP 11.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Juwan Johnson NO · TE	vsATL		8.7	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 68% Opp-weighted DvP 7.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.9 (TE11)
TE	AJ Barner SEA · TE	vsLAC		8.7	–	21	projected outside startable range Matchup math9.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 9.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.2 (TE40)
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	@BUF		8.6	–	22	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 73% Opp-weighted DvP 8.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.2 (TE16)
TE	Darren Waller CAR · TE	vsDET		8.4	–	23	limited usage Matchup math6.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 6.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.6 (TE26)
TE	Michael Mayer LV · TE	vsKC		8.2	–	24	projected outside startable range Matchup math10.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 69% Opp-weighted DvP 10.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.2 (TE7)
TE	T.J. Hockenson MIN · TE	vsMIA		8.0	–	25	projected outside startable range Matchup math10.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 73% Opp-weighted DvP 10.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	24.9 (TE1)
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	vsTEN		7.6	–	26	limited usage Matchup math6.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 6.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	13.7 (TE8)
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	@CLE		7.0	–	27	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 5.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	10.7 (TE18)
TE	Dawson Knox BUF · TE	vsNE		6.9	–	28	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 50% Opp-weighted DvP 5.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE33)
TE	Tyler Higbee LAR · TE	@PHI		6.5	–	29	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 4.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.7 (TE12)
TE	Greg Dulcich MIA · TE	@MIN		6.5	–	30	limited usage, low total Matchup math4.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 39% Opp-weighted DvP 4.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE73)
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	vsNYJ		6.3	–	31	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 75% Opp-weighted DvP 6.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE34)
TE	Oronde Gadsden LAC · TE	@SEA		6.3	–	32	low total Matchup math6.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 57% Opp-weighted DvP 6.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.8 (TE22)
TE	Elijah Higgins ARI · TE	@NYG		6.2	–	33	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 5.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.9 (TE20)
TE	Dalton Kincaid BUF · TE	vsNE		5.9	–	34	limited usage Matchup math3.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 3.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE46)
TE	Brock Wright DET · TE	@CAR		5.7	–	35	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 5.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE44)
TE	Tommy Tremble CAR · TE	vsDET		5.7	–	36	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 5.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.2 (TE27)
TE	Ben Sinnott WSH · TE	vsIND		5.5	–	37	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 6.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE85)
TE	Jake Ferguson DAL · TE	@HOU		5.5	–	38	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 57% Opp-weighted DvP 5.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.1 (TE28)
TE	Evan Engram DEN · TE	@SF		5.4	–	39	limited usage Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE47)
TE	Josh Oliver MIN · TE	vsMIA	IR	5.4	–	40	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math6.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 6.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Terrance Ferguson LAR · TE	@PHI	IR	5.3	–	41	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 67% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Gunnar Helm TEN · TE	@BAL		5.1	–	42	low total Matchup math4.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 4.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.5 (TE31)
TE	Mike Gesicki CIN · TE	vsJAX		4.8	–	43	limited usage Matchup math2.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 42% Opp-weighted DvP 2.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	13.0 (TE10)
TE	Jonnu Smith GB · TE	@TB		4.7	–	44	limited usage Matchup math2.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 2.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.9 (TE36)
TE	Drew Sample CIN · TE	vsJAX		4.7	–	45	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 64% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE57)
TE	Daniel Bellinger TEN · TE	@BAL		4.4	–	46	low total Matchup math3.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 3.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.2 (TE49)
TE	Jake Tonges SF · TE	vsDEN	IR	4.4	–	47	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math2.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 2.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	@CLE		4.4	–	48	limited usage Matchup math3.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 3.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.7 (TE13)
TE	Davis Allen LAR · TE	@PHI		4.2	–	49	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 2.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE78)
TE	Drake Dabney GB · TE	@TB		4.2	–	50	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 5.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Luke Musgrave GB · TE	@TB	OUT	4.2	–	51	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Cade Stover HOU · TE	vsDAL		4.2	–	52	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 2.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.0 (TE35)
TE	Jeremy Ruckert NYJ · TE	@CHI		4.1	–	53	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE71)
TE	Erick All Jr. CIN · TE	vsJAX		4.1	–	54	limited usage Matchup math2.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 39% Opp-weighted DvP 2.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE79)
TE	Mo Alie-Cox IND · TE	@WSH		4.0	–	55	limited usage Matchup math2.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 2.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE54)
TE	Hunter Long ARI · TE	@NYG		3.9	–	56	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.0 (TE42)
TE	Isaiah Likely NYG · TE	vsARI		3.7	–	57	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 3.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	13.6 (TE9)
TE	John FitzPatrick CLE · TE	vsPIT		3.6	–	58	limited usage, low total Matchup math3.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 47% Opp-weighted DvP 3.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Mitchell Evans CAR · TE	vsDET		3.6	–	59	limited usage Matchup math2.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 2.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE45)
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	vsIND		3.6	–	60	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 2.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE62)
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	@LV		3.5	–	61	limited usage Matchup math2.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.7 (TE29)
TE	Eric Saubert SEA · TE	vsLAC		3.5	–	62	limited usage Matchup math2.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE53)
TE	Stone Smartt NO · TE	vsATL		3.3	–	63	limited usage Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Austin Hooper ATL · TE	@NO		3.3	–	64	limited usage Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.9 (TE43)
TE	Brevin Jordan HOU · TE	vsDAL		3.2	–	65	limited usage Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.3 (TE39)
TE	Julian Hill NE · TE	@BUF	IR	3.2	–	66	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math2.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 2.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	@SF		3.2	–	67	projected outside startable range Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE58)
TE	Tanner Hudson CIN · TE	vsJAX		3.2	–	68	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.2 (TE48)
TE	Jackson Hawes BUF · TE	vsNE		3.1	–	69	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE82)
TE	Grant Calcaterra PHI · TE	vsLAR		3.0	–	70	limited usage Matchup math1.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Brevyn Spann-Ford DAL · TE	@HOU		2.9	–	71	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 33% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE68)
TE	Josh Whyle GB · TE	@TB		2.9	–	72	limited usage Matchup math2.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 2.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE66)
TE	David Njoku LAC · TE	@SEA	IR	2.8	–	73	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math1.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 1.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Brenden Bates JAX · TE	@CIN		2.8	–	74	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Quintin Morris JAX · TE	@CIN		2.8	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE63)
TE	Tanner Conner NE · TE	@BUF		2.8	–	76	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Ja'Tavion Sanders CAR · TE	vsDET		2.8	–	77	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Elijah Arroyo SEA · TE	vsLAC		2.6	–	78	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE83)
TE	Foster Moreau HOU · TE	vsDAL		2.5	–	79	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.1 (TE50)
TE	Charlie Woerner ATL · TE	@NO		2.4	–	80	tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE60)
TE	Ian Thomas LV · TE	vsKC		2.3	–	81	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.2 (TE17)
TE	Tip Reiman ARI · TE	@NYG	OUT	2.3	–	82	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math1.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 37% Opp-weighted DvP 1.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Ben Sims SEA · TE	vsLAC		2.3	–	83	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	@HOU		2.3	–	84	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 33% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE75)
TE	Keleki Latu BUF · TE	vsNE		2.1	–	85	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE84)
TE	Kenny Yeboah ARI · TE	@NYG		2.1	–	86	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Lucas Krull DEN · TE	@SF		2.0	–	87	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 29% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Kylen Granson TEN · TE	@BAL		1.9	–	88	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math1.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 33% Opp-weighted DvP 1.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Blake Whiteheart CLE · TE	vsPIT		1.8	–	89	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math1.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 1.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE72)
TE	Charlie Kolar LAC · TE	@SEA		1.8	–	90	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Jack Stoll SF · TE	vsDEN		1.8	–	91	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Noah Fant NO · TE	vsATL		1.7	–	92	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	E.J. Jenkins ATL · TE	@NO		1.6	–	93	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE64)
TE	Moliki Matavao NO · TE	vsATL	IR	1.5	–	94	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Drew Ogletree IND · TE	@WSH		1.5	–	95	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE86)
TE	Zaire Mitchell-Paden HOU · TE	vsDAL		1.4	–	96	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Tyler Conklin DET · TE	@CAR		1.3	–	97	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	David Martin-Robinson TEN · TE	@BAL		1.3	–	98	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE69)
TE	Johnny Mundt PHI · TE	vsLAR		1.2	–	99	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE55)
TE	Nate Adkins DEN · TE	@SF		1.2	–	100	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE77)
TE	Jelani Woods NYJ · TE	@CHI		1.2	–	101	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 23% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.1 (TE41)
TE	Luke Farrell SF · TE	vsDEN		1.1	–	102	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE61)
TE	Durham Smythe BAL · TE	vsTEN		1.1	–	103	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE56)
TE	Will Mallory IND · TE	@WSH		1.1	–	104	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 14% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Pharaoh Brown IND · TE	@WSH		1.0	–	105	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 14% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Jack Westover WSH · TE	vsIND		1.0	–	106	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Ben Yurosek MIN · TE	vsMIA		1.0	–	107	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 18% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Devin Culp MIN · TE	vsMIA		0.9	–	108	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Payne Durham TB · TE	vsGB		0.9	–	109	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE76)
TE	Chris Manhertz NYG · TE	vsARI		0.8	–	110	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE51)
TE	Colson Yankoff WSH · TE	vsIND		0.7	–	111	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE70)
TE	Cam Grandy CIN · TE	vsJAX		0.7	–	112	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	James Mitchell DAL · TE	@HOU		0.6	–	113	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 12% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Sean McKeon IND · TE	@WSH	Q	0.6	–	114	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Nick Kallerup SEA · TE	vsLAC		0.5	–	115	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Jared Wiley KC · TE	@LV		0.3	–	116	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Cole Turner MIA · TE	@MIN	IR	0.2	–	117	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Teagan Quitoriano ARI · TE	@NYG		0.2	–	118	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Cameron Latu NE · TE	@BUF		0.2	–	119	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE74)
TE	Brayden Willis SF · TE	vsDEN		0.2	–	120	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE67)
TE	Nick Vannett BAL · TE	vsTEN		0.1	–	121	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Hayden Rucci LAC · TE	@SEA		0.1	–	122	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE80)
TE	Treyton Welch NO · TE	vsATL		0.1	–	123	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 8% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE81)
TE	Stephen Carlson CHI · TE	vsNYJ		0.1	–	124	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	CJ Dippre TB · TE	vsGB		0.0	–	125	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Nick Muse ATL · TE	@NO		0.0	–	126	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE65)
TE	Ko Kieft TB · TE	vsGB		0.0	–	127	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 14% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Carter Runyon LV · TE	vsKC	IR	-0.1	–	128	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Princeton Fant DAL · TE	@HOU	IR	-0.1	–	129	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Feleipe Franks CAR · TE	vsDET		-0.1	–	130	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE59)
TE	Nikola Kalinic CHI · TE	vsNYJ	IR	-0.1	–	131	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Thomas Fidone II NYG · TE	vsARI		-0.2	–	132	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 5% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	–
TE	Robert Tonyan PIT · TE	@CLE		-0.3	–	133	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE52)