Loading…
Mitchell Evans
TE · CAR
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
21.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs CHI: allows 12.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 18/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs CHI
contextNo prior games vs CHI in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %45%
Target share7%
Opportunities2
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#23 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
134Easy
#1 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#23 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Panthers TE Evans carted off at camp practicewww.espn.com · 2026-07-28
- Training Camp Observations: Getting heated first day in padswww.panthers.com · 2026-07-28
- Training Camp Observations: Defense steps up in Nic Scourton's absencewww.panthers.com · 2026-07-24
- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ TB | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 7% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W17 | vs SEA | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 57% | 10% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vsTB | 3 | 3 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 30% | 10% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W15 | @ NO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs LAR | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 15% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ SF | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 22% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ ATL | 2 | 2 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 5% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W10 | vsNO | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 32% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | @ GB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ NYJ | 3 | 2 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 10% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs DAL | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 5% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W5 | vs MIA | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | – | – | 37% | 4% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W4 | @ NE | 4 | 3 | 23 | 1 | – | – | 54% | 13% | 11.3 |
| 2025 W3 | vsATL | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 4% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W2 | @ ARI | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 7% | 2% | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ JAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 14% | 0% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
15 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 15 Sit calls
Based on 15 graded calls.
Recent calls
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade