Loading…
Jackson Hawes
TE · BUF
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
23.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs HOU: allows 12.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 21/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs HOU
contextvs HOU: 1 game, 4.6 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W12 |  BUF | @ HOU | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 4.6 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %29%
Target share4%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
98Average
#22 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
108Easy
#8 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
98Average
#22 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Copy of Could an NFL roster of only bench players be compe...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs NYJ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 29% | 4% | 1.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ CLE | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 64% | 11% | 4.6 |
| 2025 W15 | @ NE | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 44% | 4% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W14 | vs CIN | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 53% | 4% | 7.3 |
| 2025 W13 | @ PIT | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 70% | 4% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @HOU | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 33% | 7% | 4.6 |
| 2025 W11 | vs TB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ MIA | 2 | 1 | 26 | 1 | 43% | 5% | 9.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs KC | 2 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 47% | 8% | 2.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ CAR | 3 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 56% | 13% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W6 | @ ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vsNE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs NO | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 53% | 5% | 2.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vsMIA | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 43% | 4% | 7.5 |
| 2025 W2 | @NYJ | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 47% | 4% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs BAL | 1 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 19% | 2% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim93%hit rate
15 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 93%
of 15 Sit calls
Based on 15 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | NYJ | SIT | 3.4 | TE60 (1.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | PHI | SIT | 4.0 | TE94 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | CLE | SIT | 3.6 | TE34 (4.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | NE | SIT | 3.2 | TE53 (1.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | CIN | SIT | 3.8 | TE17 (7.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | PIT | SIT | 3.4 | TE49 (2.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | HOU | SIT | 3.9 | TE31 (4.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | TB | SIT | 4.3 | TE88 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | MIA | SIT | 3.4 | TE12 (9.6) | ✗ |
| 2025 W9 | KC | SIT | 2.9 | TE42 (2.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade