Loading…
Blake Whiteheart
TE · CLE
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage, low total
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
16.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs JAX: allows 14.8 PPR/g to TE, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs JAX
contextvs JAX: 1 game, 0.0 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 |  CLE | @ JAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %65%
Target share5%
Opportunities1
Signal · descriptiveOpportunity rising, production lagging (last-3-week opportunities up vs the prior three while fantasy output hasn’t followed. Often a buy-low pattern.)
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
107Easy
#2 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
97Average
#21 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
107Easy
#2 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ CIN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs PIT | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs TEN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs SF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ LV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs BAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ NYJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ NE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs MIA | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 61% | 6% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W6 | @PIT | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 2% | 1.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs MIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ DET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs GB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @BAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vsCIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @BAL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 36% | 3% | 1.1 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim96%hit rate
28 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 96%
of 28 Sit calls
Based on 28 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | CIN | SIT | 1.7 | TE82 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | PIT | SIT | 0.7 | TE82 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | BUF | SIT | 0.4 | TE86 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | CHI | SIT | 0.3 | TE86 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | TEN | SIT | -0.1 | TE76 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | SF | SIT | -0.2 | TE88 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | LV | SIT | 0.7 | TE75 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | BAL | SIT | 1.1 | TE76 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | NYJ | SIT | 1.2 | TE73 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | NE | SIT | 1.4 | TE69 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade