Loading…
Terrance Ferguson
TE · LAR
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
26.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs SF: allows 14.8 PPR/g to TE, rank 8/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs SF
contextvs SF: 2 games, 3.7 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %49%
Target share11%
Opportunities4
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 14.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
98Average
#19 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
108Easy
#7 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
98Average
#19 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Biggest Instant Impact Rookie For Every Teamnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-28
- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- Dart, Tate and others primed to follow path of 202...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- Copy of Could an NFL roster of only bench players be compe...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | @ ATL | 4 | 2 | 54 | 1 | – | – | 49% | 11% | 13.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ SEA | 4 | 3 | 33 | 1 | – | – | 76% | 8% | 12.3 |
| 2025 W15 | vs DET | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 5% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ ARI | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 64% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ CAR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 35% | 7% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs TB | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 27% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vsSEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ SF | 4 | 1 | 32 | 0 | – | – | 32% | 12% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs NO | 3 | 2 | 54 | 0 | – | – | 30% | 10% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ JAX | 3 | 1 | 31 | 1 | – | – | 49% | 9% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W6 | @ BAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vsSF | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 6% | 2% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ TEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 7% | 0% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim92%hit rate
12 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 92%
of 12 Sit calls
Based on 12 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | ATL | SIT | 4.6 | TE9 (13.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | SEA | SIT | 2.9 | TE13 (12.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | DET | SIT | 2.2 | TE55 (1.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | ARI | SIT | 2.8 | TE84 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | CAR | SIT | 3.3 | TE96 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | TB | SIT | 4.5 | TE86 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | SEA | SIT | 4.5 | TE87 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | SF | SIT | 3.5 | TE29 (4.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | NO | SIT | 2.3 | TE27 (7.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | JAX | SIT | 0.6 | TE17 (10.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade