
Why: projected outside startable range
vs GB: allows 12.1 PPR/g to TE, rank 22/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Justin Fields. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (106/459). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE34), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs GB in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 14.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
There was a spark in a red zone period late in practice, with Smith throwing touchdowns to tight end Mason Taylor and wide receiver Garrett Wilson (on a deflection). Translation: He probably will miss at least a chunk of the preseason, affo
source ↗There was a spark in a red zone period late in practice, with Smith throwing touchdowns to tight end Mason Taylor and wide receiver Garrett Wilson (on a deflection). Translation: He probably will miss at least a chunk of the preseason, affo
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 3 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 0% | 13% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 8 | 5 | 51 | 0 | 66% | 26% | 10.1 | 7.6 | 5.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 4 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 83% | 13% | 4.1 | 3.1 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 5 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 88% | 19% | 5.1 | 3.6 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 4 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 75% | 15% | 7.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 78% | 18% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 8 | 5 | 34 | 1 | 76% | 28% | 14.4 | 11.9 | 9.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 5 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 93% | 16% | 6.1 | 4.6 | 3.1 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 96% | 7% | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 12 | 9 | 67 | 0 | 84% | 29% | 17.7 | 13.2 | 8.7 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 7 | 5 | 65 | 0 | 81% | 26% | 11.5 | 9.0 | 6.5 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 6 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 74% | 17% | 5.8 | 3.8 | 1.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 72% | 10% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 88% | 5% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 11 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 7.6 | TE14 (10.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 8.8 | TE33 (4.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 8.7 | TE29 (5.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 8.0 | TE18 (7.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 10.1 | TE50 (1.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 10.2 | TE7 (14.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | START | 9.9 | TE27 (6.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W6 | FLEX | 9.9 | TE54 (1.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 7.4 | TE8 (17.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 6.0 | TE11 (11.5) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade