
Why: OUT · INJ gate
vs LAC: allows 10.5 PPR/g to TE, rank 28/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Geno Smith. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (156/489). Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 13.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 14% | 6% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 11 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | -0.3 | TE94 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | -0.2 | TE98 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | -0.3 | TE101 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | -0.4 | TE100 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | -0.2 | TE87 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 0.1 | TE100 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 0.2 | TE90 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 0.4 | TE91 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 0.4 | TE83 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | -0.3 | TE50 (1.3) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade