Loading…
Tyler Warren
TE · IND
FLEX
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: heavy usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs BAL: allows 10.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 26/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs BAL
contextNo prior games vs BAL in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %82%
Target share24%
Opportunities8
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
104Easy
#5 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
121Easy
#3 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
104Easy
#5 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- One 2026 Breakout Candidate For All 32 NFL Teamsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-27
- Dart, Tate and others primed to follow path of 202...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- PFF Tight End Rankings: The top 32 players ahead of the 2026 NFL seasonwww.pff.com · 2026-07-22
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ HOU | 8 | 5 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 24% | 7.6 |
| 2025 W17 | vs JAX | 5 | 5 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 17% | 9.3 |
| 2025 W16 | vs SF | 9 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 25% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ SEA | 6 | 3 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 23% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W14 | @JAX | 6 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 93% | 17% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vsHOU | 4 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 87% | 16% | 11.2 |
| 2025 W12 | @ KC | 7 | 5 | 45 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 23% | 9.5 |
| 2025 W10 | vs ATL | 10 | 8 | 99 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 39% | 17.9 |
| 2025 W9 | @ PIT | 7 | 5 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 15% | 7.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs TEN | 5 | 4 | 53 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 18% | 9.3 |
| 2025 W7 | @ LAC | 5 | 4 | 69 | 1 | – | – | 92% | 16% | 16.9 |
| 2025 W6 | vs ARI | 9 | 6 | 63 | 1 | – | – | 88% | 30% | 18.3 |
| 2025 W5 | vs LV | 4 | 4 | 44 | 1 | – | – | 71% | 13% | 14.4 |
| 2025 W4 | @ LAR | 6 | 5 | 70 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 89% | 19% | 18.3 |
| 2025 W3 | @TEN | 5 | 3 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 20% | 6.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs DEN | 7 | 4 | 79 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 93% | 21% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs MIA | 9 | 7 | 76 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 73% | 31% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim33%hit rate
15 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 36%
of 11 Start calls
🟡 25%
of 4 Flex calls
Based on 15 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | HOU | FLEX | 9.4 | TE20 (7.6) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | JAX | FLEX | 9.8 | TE17 (9.3) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | SF | FLEX | 9.6 | TE22 (6.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | SEA | START | 11.1 | TE29 (4.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W14 | JAX | START | 11.5 | TE31 (3.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | HOU | START | 11.4 | TE14 (11.2) | ✗ |
| 2025 W12 | KC | START | 11.3 | TE13 (9.5) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | ATL | FLEX | 10.9 | TE5 (17.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | PIT | START | 11.0 | TE26 (7.6) | ✗ |
| 2025 W8 | TEN | START | 11.8 | TE13 (9.3) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade