Loading…
Harold Fannin Jr.
TE · CLE
START
upcoming
2026 Week 1QUESTIONABLE
Why: form-driven
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
16.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs JAX: allows 14.8 PPR/g to TE, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs JAX
contextNo prior games vs JAX in the record.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %23%
Target share9%
Opportunities2
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
107Easy
#2 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
97Average
#21 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
107Easy
#2 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Cleveland Browns 2026 preview: Todd Monken takes over rebuilt offense and a defense without Myles Garrettwww.pff.com · 2026-07-28
- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- 2026 Fantasy Football: Tight ends to avoid in draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-24
- Dart, Tate and others primed to follow path of 202...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs PIT | 2 | 2 | 30 | 1 | – | – | 23% | 9% | 11.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs BUF | 6 | 4 | 34 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 86% | 22% | 19.5 |
| 2025 W15 | @ CHI | 14 | 7 | 48 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 96% | 45% | 12.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs TEN | 11 | 8 | 114 | 1 | – | – | 90% | 29% | 25.4 |
| 2025 W13 | vs SF | 5 | 3 | 43 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 92% | 22% | 11.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ LV | 6 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 90% | 33% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W11 | vs BAL | 5 | 2 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 20% | 4.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ NYJ | 7 | 4 | 44 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 22% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W8 | @ NE | 8 | 6 | 62 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 74% | 24% | 18.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vs MIA | 5 | 4 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 28% | 7.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @PIT | 10 | 7 | 81 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 20% | 15.1 |
| 2025 W5 | vs MIN | 4 | 4 | 13 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 13% | 11.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ DET | 6 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 85% | 18% | 4.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs GB | 4 | 3 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 64% | 13% | 5.5 |
| 2025 W2 | @BAL | 5 | 5 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 12% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs CIN | 9 | 7 | 63 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 72% | 21% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim36%hit rate
14 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 43%
of 7 Start calls
🟡 20%
of 5 Flex calls
🔴 50%
of 2 Sit calls
Based on 14 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | PIT | START | 14.5 | TE14 (11.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | BUF | START | 14.3 | TE2 (19.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | CHI | START | 11.9 | TE11 (12.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | TEN | START | 10.3 | TE1 (25.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | SF | FLEX | 10.7 | TE13 (11.3) | ✗ |
| 2025 W12 | LV | START | 10.3 | TE16 (8.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | BAL | START | 11.2 | TE30 (4.6) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | NYJ | START | 11.0 | TE17 (8.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W8 | NE | FLEX | 9.8 | TE4 (18.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | MIA | FLEX | 8.9 | TE24 (7.6) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade