
Why: soft matchup



vs TB: allows 15.7 PPR/g to TE, rank 6/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Shedeur Sanders. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (169/519). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE5), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs TB in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 3 | 2 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 14% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 2 | 2 | 30 | 1 | – | – | 23% | 9% | 11.0 | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 6 | 4 | 34 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 86% | 22% | 19.5 | 17.5 | 15.5 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 14 | 7 | 48 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 96% | 45% | 12.0 | 8.5 | 5.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 11 | 8 | 114 | 1 | – | – | 90% | 29% | 25.4 | 21.4 | 17.4 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 5 | 3 | 43 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 92% | 22% | 11.3 | 9.8 | 8.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 6 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 90% | 33% | 8.4 | 6.4 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 5 | 2 | 26 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 20% | 4.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 7 | 4 | 44 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 22% | 8.4 | 6.4 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 8 | 6 | 62 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 74% | 24% | 18.4 | 15.4 | 12.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 5 | 4 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 28% | 7.6 | 5.6 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 10 | 7 | 81 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 20% | 15.1 | 11.6 | 8.1 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 4 | 4 | 13 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 13% | 11.3 | 9.3 | 7.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 6 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 85% | 18% | 4.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 4 | 3 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 64% | 13% | 5.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 5 | 5 | 48 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 12% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 9 | 7 | 63 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 72% | 21% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 14 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | START | 14.5 | TE14 (11.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 14.3 | TE2 (19.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 11.9 | TE11 (12.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 10.3 | TE1 (25.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 10.7 | TE13 (11.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 10.3 | TE16 (8.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 11.2 | TE30 (4.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 11.0 | TE17 (8.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 9.8 | TE4 (18.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 8.9 | TE24 (7.6) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade