Loading…
Ben Yurosek
TE · MIN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs GB: allows 12.1 PPR/g to TE, rank 22/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs GB
contextvs GB: 1 game, 1.9 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 |  MIN | vs GB | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1.9 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %39%
Target share3%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 12.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
100Average
#14 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
110Easy
#5 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
100Average
#14 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
contextNo availability flags or recent headlines.
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vsGB | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 39% | 3% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W17 | vs DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ NYG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs BAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | @DET | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ LAC | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 31% | 7% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W7 | vs PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs ATL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | – |
| 2025 W1 | @CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | – |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
10 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 10 Sit calls
Based on 10 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | GB | SIT | 0.1 | TE49 (1.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | DET | SIT | -0.2 | TE92 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | NYG | SIT | 0.1 | TE99 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | DAL | SIT | 0.9 | TE94 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | CHI | SIT | 1.1 | TE85 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | BAL | SIT | 1.0 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | DET | SIT | 0.7 | TE78 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | LAC | SIT | 0.1 | TE44 (1.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | PHI | SIT | 0.2 | TE90 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W3 | CIN | SIT | 0.4 | TE93 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade