Insights

Research any player, explore trends.

Calls Draft Role change Reliable starts Rookies Schedule

77% hit across 15,216 callsSee the record →

▾▾

127 calls · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Status	Call	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why
TE	Trey McBride ARI · TE	vsSEA		START	15.8	–	1	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math26.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 30% Snap share 95% Opp-weighted DvP 26.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	George Kittle SF · TE	vsMIA		START	13.8	–	2	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math23.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 23% Snap share 85% Opp-weighted DvP 23.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Kyle Pitts Sr. ATL · TE	vsCAR		START	13.7	–	3	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math19.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 23% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 19.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Colston Loveland CHI · TE	vsMIN		START	13.3	–	4	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math15.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 21% Snap share 80% Opp-weighted DvP 15.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Harold Fannin Jr. CLE · TE	@TB		START	12.9	–	5	soft matchup Matchup math20.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 19% Snap share 74% Opp-weighted DvP 20.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Dallas Goedert PHI · TE	@TEN		START	12.4	–	6	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math15.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 84% Opp-weighted DvP 15.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Brock Bowers LV · TE	@LAC	OUT	SIT	11.5	–	7	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math17.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 97% Opp-weighted DvP 17.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	vsIND		FLEX	11.4	–	8	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math20.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 89% Opp-weighted DvP 20.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Tucker Kraft GB · TE	@NYJ		FLEX	11.0	–	9	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 81% Opp-weighted DvP 13.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	vsCIN		FLEX	10.6	–	10	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math17.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 17.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Tyler Warren IND · TE	@KC		FLEX	10.5	–	11	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 19% Snap share 85% Opp-weighted DvP 16.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	vsNYG		FLEX	10.3	–	12	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math9.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 84% Opp-weighted DvP 9.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Sam LaPorta DET · TE	@BUF		FLEX	10.3	–	13	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math11.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 11.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Chig Okonkwo WSH · TE	@DAL	Q	FLEX	9.9	–	14	soft matchup Matchup math9.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 58% Opp-weighted DvP 9.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Cade Otton TB · TE	vsCLE		FLEX	9.7	–	15	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 12.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Theo Johnson NYG · TE	@LAR		SIT	9.2	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math15.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 88% Opp-weighted DvP 15.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	vsPIT		SIT	9.0	–	17	projected outside startable range Matchup math12.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 73% Opp-weighted DvP 12.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Brenton Strange JAX · TE	@DEN		SIT	9.0	–	18	projected outside startable range Matchup math11.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 75% Opp-weighted DvP 11.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Mason Taylor NYJ · TE	vsGB		SIT	8.8	–	19	projected outside startable range Matchup math11.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 78% Opp-weighted DvP 11.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	AJ Barner SEA · TE	@ARI		SIT	8.6	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math10.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 10.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Juwan Johnson NO · TE	@BAL		SIT	8.5	–	21	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 68% Opp-weighted DvP 8.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Darren Waller CAR · TE	@ATL		SIT	8.3	–	22	limited usage Matchup math6.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 6.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Michael Mayer LV · TE	@LAC		SIT	7.9	–	23	projected outside startable range Matchup math9.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 69% Opp-weighted DvP 9.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	T.J. Hockenson MIN · TE	@CHI		SIT	7.7	–	24	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 73% Opp-weighted DvP 8.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	vsNO		SIT	7.6	–	25	limited usage Matchup math6.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 6.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	@NE		SIT	6.9	–	26	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 6.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Dawson Knox BUF · TE	vsDET		SIT	6.9	–	27	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 50% Opp-weighted DvP 4.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Tyler Higbee LAR · TE	vsNYG		SIT	6.8	–	28	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 4.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Oronde Gadsden LAC · TE	vsLV		SIT	6.7	–	29	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 57% Opp-weighted DvP 5.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Greg Dulcich MIA · TE	@SF		SIT	6.6	–	30	limited usage, low total Matchup math5.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 39% Opp-weighted DvP 5.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	vsMIN		SIT	6.5	–	31	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 75% Opp-weighted DvP 6.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Elijah Higgins ARI · TE	vsSEA		SIT	6.1	–	32	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 6.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Dalton Kincaid BUF · TE	vsDET		SIT	5.9	–	33	limited usage Matchup math2.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 2.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Jake Ferguson DAL · TE	vsWSH		SIT	5.8	–	34	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 57% Opp-weighted DvP 5.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Tommy Tremble CAR · TE	@ATL		SIT	5.6	–	35	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 5.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Evan Engram DEN · TE	vsJAX		SIT	5.6	–	36	limited usage Matchup math3.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 3.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Terrance Ferguson LAR · TE	vsNYG		SIT	5.5	–	37	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 67% Opp-weighted DvP 3.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Ben Sinnott WSH · TE	@DAL		SIT	5.5	–	38	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 5.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Brock Wright DET · TE	@BUF		SIT	5.3	–	39	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 4.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Gunnar Helm TEN · TE	vsPHI		SIT	5.1	–	40	low total Matchup math4.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 4.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Josh Oliver MIN · TE	@CHI		SIT	5.0	–	41	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 5.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Jonnu Smith GB · TE	@NYJ		SIT	4.7	–	42	limited usage Matchup math2.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 2.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Jake Tonges SF · TE	vsMIA	Q	SIT	4.7	–	43	limited usage Matchup math2.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 2.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Cade Stover HOU · TE	vsCIN		SIT	4.6	–	44	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 4.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Davis Allen LAR · TE	vsNYG	Q	SIT	4.5	–	45	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Mike Gesicki CIN · TE	@HOU		SIT	4.4	–	46	limited usage Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 42% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Daniel Bellinger TEN · TE	vsPHI		SIT	4.4	–	47	low total Matchup math3.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 3.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	@NE		SIT	4.3	–	48	limited usage Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Drew Sample CIN · TE	@HOU		SIT	4.3	–	49	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 64% Opp-weighted DvP 3.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Drake Dabney GB · TE	@NYJ		SIT	4.2	–	50	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 4.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Luke Musgrave GB · TE	@NYJ	OUT	SIT	4.2	–	51	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Jeremy Ruckert NYJ · TE	vsGB		SIT	4.1	–	52	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Isaiah Likely NYG · TE	@LAR		SIT	3.8	–	53	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 3.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Hunter Long ARI · TE	vsSEA		SIT	3.8	–	54	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 2.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Mo Alie-Cox IND · TE	@KC		SIT	3.7	–	55	limited usage Matchup math2.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 2.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	vsIND		SIT	3.7	–	56	limited usage Matchup math2.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Erick All Jr. CIN · TE	@HOU		SIT	3.7	–	57	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 39% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Brevin Jordan HOU · TE	vsCIN	OUT	SIT	3.7	–	58	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math2.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Julian Hill NE · TE	vsPIT	IR	SIT	3.6	–	59	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math2.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 2.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	@DAL		SIT	3.5	–	60	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 2.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Mitchell Evans CAR · TE	@ATL		SIT	3.5	–	61	limited usage Matchup math2.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 2.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Eric Saubert SEA · TE	@ARI		SIT	3.4	–	62	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	vsJAX		SIT	3.3	–	63	projected outside startable range Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Brevyn Spann-Ford DAL · TE	vsWSH		SIT	3.2	–	64	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 33% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	David Njoku LAC · TE	vsLV		SIT	3.2	–	65	limited usage Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Austin Hooper ATL · TE	vsCAR		SIT	3.2	–	66	limited usage Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Jackson Hawes BUF · TE	vsDET		SIT	3.1	–	67	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Stone Smartt NO · TE	@BAL		SIT	3.0	–	68	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Shane Zylstra NE · TE	vsPIT		SIT	3.0	–	69	tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 58% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Grant Calcaterra PHI · TE	@TEN	IR	SIT	3.0	–	70	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Foster Moreau HOU · TE	vsCIN		SIT	2.9	–	71	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Josh Whyle GB · TE	@NYJ	Q	SIT	2.9	–	72	limited usage Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Tanner Hudson CIN · TE	@HOU		SIT	2.8	–	73	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Ja'Tavion Sanders CAR · TE	@ATL	OUT	SIT	2.7	–	74	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	vsWSH		SIT	2.6	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 33% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Elijah Arroyo SEA · TE	@ARI		SIT	2.5	–	76	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Charlie Woerner ATL · TE	vsCAR		SIT	2.3	–	77	tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Quintin Morris JAX · TE	@DEN		SIT	2.3	–	78	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Tip Reiman ARI · TE	vsSEA	OUT	SIT	2.2	–	79	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 37% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Charlie Kolar LAC · TE	vsLV		SIT	2.2	–	80	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Lucas Krull DEN · TE	vsJAX		SIT	2.1	–	81	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 29% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Ian Thomas LV · TE	@LAC		SIT	2.1	–	82	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 1.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Keleki Latu BUF · TE	vsDET		SIT	2.1	–	83	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Kylen Granson TEN · TE	vsPHI		SIT	1.8	–	84	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 33% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Zaire Mitchell-Paden HOU · TE	vsCIN		SIT	1.8	–	85	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Blake Whiteheart CLE · TE	@TB		SIT	1.8	–	86	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	E.J. Jenkins PHI · TE	@TEN		SIT	1.5	–	87	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Noah Fant NO · TE	@BAL		SIT	1.4	–	88	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Luke Farrell SF · TE	vsMIA		SIT	1.4	–	89	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Nate Adkins DEN · TE	vsJAX		SIT	1.3	–	90	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	David Martin-Robinson TEN · TE	vsPHI		SIT	1.3	–	91	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Payne Durham TB · TE	vsCLE		SIT	1.2	–	92	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Johnny Mundt PHI · TE	@TEN		SIT	1.2	–	93	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Moliki Matavao NO · TE	@BAL	IR	SIT	1.2	–	94	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Jelani Woods NYJ · TE	vsGB		SIT	1.2	–	95	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 23% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Durham Smythe BAL · TE	vsNO		SIT	1.2	–	96	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Drew Ogletree IND · TE	@KC		SIT	1.1	–	97	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Jack Westover WSH · TE	@DAL		SIT	1.0	–	98	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Chris Manhertz NYG · TE	@LAR		SIT	0.9	–	99	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Tyler Conklin DET · TE	@BUF		SIT	0.9	–	100	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	James Mitchell DAL · TE	vsWSH		SIT	0.9	–	101	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 12% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Will Mallory IND · TE	@KC	IR	SIT	0.8	–	102	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 14% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Pharaoh Brown IND · TE	@KC		SIT	0.7	–	103	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 14% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Ben Yurosek MIN · TE	@CHI	IR	SIT	0.6	–	104	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 18% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Colson Yankoff WSH · TE	@DAL		SIT	0.6	–	105	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Cameron Latu NE · TE	vsPIT		SIT	0.6	–	106	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Nick Kallerup SEA · TE	@ARI	OUT	SIT	0.5	–	107	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Jared Wiley KC · TE	vsIND		SIT	0.5	–	108	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Brayden Willis SF · TE	vsMIA		SIT	0.5	–	109	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Hayden Rucci JAX · TE	@DEN		SIT	0.4	–	110	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	CJ Dippre TB · TE	vsCLE		SIT	0.4	–	111	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Cole Turner MIA · TE	@SF	IR	SIT	0.4	–	112	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Ko Kieft TB · TE	vsCLE		SIT	0.4	–	113	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 14% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Sean McKeon IND · TE	@KC	Q	SIT	0.3	–	114	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Cam Grandy MIN · TE	@CHI		SIT	0.2	–	115	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Stephen Carlson CHI · TE	vsMIN		SIT	0.2	–	116	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Nick Vannett BAL · TE	vsNO		SIT	0.2	–	117	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Princeton Fant DAL · TE	vsWSH	IR	SIT	0.2	–	118	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Thomas Odukoya KC · TE	vsIND		SIT	0.2	–	119	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Teagan Quitoriano ARI · TE	vsSEA		SIT	0.1	–	120	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Nikola Kalinic CHI · TE	vsMIN	IR	SIT	0.0	–	121	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Thomas Fidone II NYG · TE	@LAR	OUT	SIT	0.0	–	122	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 5% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Nick Muse ATL · TE	vsCAR		SIT	-0.1	–	123	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Treyton Welch NO · TE	@BAL		SIT	-0.2	–	124	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 8% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Feleipe Franks CAR · TE	@ATL		SIT	-0.2	–	125	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Carter Runyon LV · TE	@LAC	IR	SIT	-0.3	–	126	OUT · INJ gate Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.
TE	Robert Tonyan PIT · TE	@NE		SIT	-0.4	–	127	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.