Start / Sit

Accountable start/sit calls you can verify.

Back-test your league. See how our calls would've scored on your actual Sleeper team.Connect →

77% hit across 15,216 callsSee the record →

▾▾

92 calls · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Call	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why	Finish
TE	Trey McBride ARI · TE	vsSF	START	16.8	–	1	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math20.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 28% Snap share 87% Opp-weighted DvP 20.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	27.5 (TE1)✓
TE	Brock Bowers LV · TE	vsDAL	START	12.4	–	2	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math13.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 19% Snap share 81% Opp-weighted DvP 13.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	14.2 (TE6)✓
TE	Cade Otton TB · TE	@BUF	START	12.0	–	3	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math15.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 23% Snap share 98% Opp-weighted DvP 15.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.8 (TE28)✗
TE	Kyle Pitts Sr. ATL · TE	vsCAR	START	11.8	–	4	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math18.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 90% Opp-weighted DvP 18.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.4 (TE36)✗
TE	Dallas Goedert PHI · TE	vsDET	START	11.3	–	5	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 19% Snap share 84% Opp-weighted DvP 13.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.4 (TE32)✗
TE	Harold Fannin Jr. CLE · TE	vsBAL	START	11.2	–	6	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math13.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 18% Snap share 76% Opp-weighted DvP 13.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE30)✗
TE	Oronde Gadsden II LAC · TE	@JAX	START	10.8	–	7	soft matchup Matchup math12.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 72% Opp-weighted DvP 12.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.1 (TE26)✗
TE	Theo Johnson NYG · TE	vsGB	FLEX	10.8	–	8	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math15.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 19% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 15.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.6 (TE22)✗
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	@TEN	FLEX	10.7	–	9	soft matchup Matchup math8.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 73% Opp-weighted DvP 8.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.1 (TE8)✓
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	@DEN	FLEX	10.6	–	10	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 77% Opp-weighted DvP 13.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	24.1 (TE3)✓
TE	George Kittle SF · TE	@ARI	FLEX	9.8	–	11	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math11.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 87% Opp-weighted DvP 11.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	24.7 (TE2)✓
TE	Zach Ertz WSH · TE	@MIA	FLEX	9.6	–	12	soft matchup Matchup math14.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 68% Opp-weighted DvP 14.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.2 (TE14)✗
TE	Colston Loveland CHI · TE	@MIN	FLEX	9.2	–	13	soft matchup Matchup math8.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 73% Opp-weighted DvP 8.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.0 (TE17)✗
TE	Michael Mayer LV · TE	vsDAL	FLEX	9.1	–	14	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math11.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 83% Opp-weighted DvP 11.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.3 (TE33)✗
TE	David Njoku CLE · TE	vsBAL	FLEX	8.7	–	15	soft matchup Matchup math8.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 67% Opp-weighted DvP 8.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE47)✗
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	@CLE	SIT	8.4	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 7.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	15.7 (TE5)✗
TE	Jake Ferguson DAL · TE	@LV	SIT	8.3	–	17	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 7.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.6 (TE7)✗
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	vsCIN	SIT	8.2	–	18	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 8.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.9 (TE41)✓
TE	Mason Taylor NYJ · TE	@NE	SIT	8.0	–	19	low total Matchup math12.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 86% Opp-weighted DvP 12.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.0 (TE18)✓
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	vsNYJ	SIT	7.9	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math9.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 77% Opp-weighted DvP 9.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.5 (TE13)✓
TE	T.J. Hockenson MIN · TE	vsCHI	SIT	7.7	–	21	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 83% Opp-weighted DvP 8.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.9 (TE19)✓
TE	Tyler Higbee LAR · TE	vsSEA	SIT	7.3	–	22	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 6.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE37)✓
TE	Jonnu Smith PIT · TE	vsCIN	SIT	6.8	–	23	projected outside startable range Matchup math9.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 9.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE58)✓
TE	Evan Engram DEN · TE	vsKC	SIT	6.7	–	24	limited usage Matchup math6.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 6.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.3 (TE15)✓
TE	AJ Barner SEA · TE	@LAR	SIT	6.4	–	25	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 7.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	17.1 (TE4)✗
TE	Noah Fant CIN · TE	@PIT	SIT	6.2	–	26	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 4.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.6 (TE21)✓
TE	Isaiah Likely BAL · TE	@CLE	SIT	6.1	–	27	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 64% Opp-weighted DvP 5.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.5 (TE35)✓
TE	Chig Okonkwo TEN · TE	vsHOU	SIT	6.1	–	28	low total Matchup math5.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 62% Opp-weighted DvP 5.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.6 (TE12)✗
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	vsCIN	SIT	5.7	–	29	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 6.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 6.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	10.7 (TE9)✗
TE	Julian Hill MIA · TE	vsWSH	SIT	5.5	–	30	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 62% Opp-weighted DvP 4.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.4 (TE43)✓
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	vsSEA	SIT	5.2	–	31	limited usage Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.4 (TE11)✗
TE	Elijah Arroyo SEA · TE	@LAR	SIT	5.1	–	32	limited usage Matchup math4.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 43% Opp-weighted DvP 4.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE90)✓
TE	Gunnar Helm TEN · TE	vsHOU	SIT	5.0	–	33	limited usage, low total Matchup math3.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 50% Opp-weighted DvP 3.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.9 (TE20)✓
TE	Dawson Knox BUF · TE	vsTB	SIT	5.0	–	34	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 60% Opp-weighted DvP 3.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE38)✓
TE	Ja'Tavion Sanders CAR · TE	@ATL	SIT	4.8	–	35	limited usage Matchup math3.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 3.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.2 (TE25)✓
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	@MIA	SIT	4.7	–	36	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 5.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE66)✓
TE	Davis Allen LAR · TE	vsSEA	SIT	4.6	–	37	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 50% Opp-weighted DvP 3.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE83)✓
TE	Terrance Ferguson LAR · TE	vsSEA	SIT	4.5	–	38	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE87)✓
TE	Daniel Bellinger NYG · TE	vsGB	SIT	4.3	–	39	low total Matchup math2.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 60% Opp-weighted DvP 2.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE75)✓
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	@DEN	SIT	4.3	–	40	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.9 (TE40)✓
TE	Jackson Hawes BUF · TE	vsTB	SIT	4.3	–	41	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 50% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE88)✓
TE	Greg Dulcich MIA · TE	vsWSH	SIT	3.9	–	42	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 35% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.8 (TE34)✓
TE	Elijah Higgins ARI · TE	vsSF	SIT	3.8	–	43	limited usage Matchup math1.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.1 (TE53)✓
TE	Charlie Kolar BAL · TE	@CLE	SIT	3.7	–	44	limited usage Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE67)✓
TE	Cade Stover HOU · TE	@TEN	SIT	3.5	–	45	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 2.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE82)✓
TE	Luke Musgrave GB · TE	@NYG	SIT	3.5	–	46	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.9 (TE54)✓
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	@MIN	SIT	3.2	–	47	limited usage Matchup math2.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 2.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.5 (TE10)✗
TE	Josh Whyle GB · TE	@NYG	SIT	3.1	–	48	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.2 (TE16)✓
TE	Tanner Hudson CIN · TE	@PIT	SIT	3.0	–	49	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.2 (TE27)✓
TE	Johnny Mundt JAX · TE	vsLAC	SIT	3.0	–	50	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.5 (TE31)✓
TE	Brock Wright DET · TE	@PHI	SIT	2.9	–	51	projected outside startable range Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.8 (TE42)✓
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	@LV	SIT	2.9	–	52	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE79)✓
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	vsKC	SIT	2.7	–	53	tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE46)✓
TE	Grant Calcaterra PHI · TE	vsDET	SIT	2.7	–	54	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE68)✓
TE	Josh Oliver MIN · TE	vsCHI	SIT	2.6	–	55	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.7 (TE55)✓
TE	Tommy Tremble CAR · TE	@ATL	SIT	2.5	–	56	tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.4 (TE23)✓
TE	Luke Farrell SF · TE	@ARI	SIT	2.4	–	57	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE65)✓
TE	Jeremy Ruckert NYJ · TE	@NE	SIT	2.2	–	58	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 43% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.3 (TE24)✓
TE	Nick Kallerup SEA · TE	@LAR	SIT	2.0	–	59	limited usage Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 35% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE86)✓
TE	Mitchell Evans CAR · TE	@ATL	SIT	2.0	–	60	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.8 (TE29)✓
TE	Tucker Fisk LAC · TE	@JAX	SIT	1.9	–	61	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE69)✓
TE	Drew Sample CIN · TE	@PIT	SIT	1.8	–	62	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE60)✓
TE	Charlie Woerner ATL · TE	vsCAR	SIT	1.6	–	63	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE64)✓
TE	John FitzPatrick GB · TE	@NYG	SIT	1.3	–	64	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE48)✓
TE	Jack Westover NE · TE	vsNYJ	SIT	1.3	–	65	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE73)✓
TE	Brevyn Spann-Ford DAL · TE	@LV	SIT	1.2	–	66	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.4 (TE50)✓
TE	Payne Durham TB · TE	@BUF	SIT	1.2	–	67	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE80)✓
TE	Ian Thomas LV · TE	vsDAL	SIT	1.1	–	68	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 23% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.0 (TE39)✓
TE	Pharaoh Brown ARI · TE	vsSF	SIT	1.1	–	69	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE57)✓
TE	Blake Whiteheart CLE · TE	vsBAL	SIT	1.1	–	70	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 29% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE76)✓
TE	Ben Yurosek MIN · TE	vsCHI	SIT	1.1	–	71	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE85)✓
TE	Brenden Bates CLE · TE	vsBAL	SIT	0.8	–	72	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 12% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE77)✓
TE	Jake Tonges SF · TE	@ARI	SIT	0.7	–	73	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 8% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE71)✓
TE	Durham Smythe CHI · TE	@MIN	SIT	0.7	–	74	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE45)✓
TE	Kylen Granson PHI · TE	vsDET	SIT	0.6	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.4 (TE49)✓
TE	Hayden Rucci MIA · TE	vsWSH	SIT	0.6	–	76	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE84)✓
TE	Tyler Conklin LAC · TE	@JAX	SIT	0.5	–	77	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 11% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE62)✓
TE	Robert Tonyan KC · TE	@DEN	SIT	0.5	–	78	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.1 (TE52)✓
TE	David Martin-Robinson TEN · TE	vsHOU	SIT	0.4	–	79	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 10% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE72)✓
TE	Carter Runyon LV · TE	vsDAL	SIT	0.4	–	80	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE91)✓
TE	Marcedes Lewis DEN · TE	vsKC	SIT	0.4	–	81	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 18% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE92)✓
TE	Ross Dwelley DET · TE	@PHI	SIT	0.2	–	82	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 11% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE59)✓
TE	Quintin Morris JAX · TE	vsLAC	SIT	0.2	–	83	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.1 (TE44)✓
TE	Cameron Latu PHI · TE	vsDET	SIT	0.1	–	84	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 10% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE78)✓
TE	Colson Yankoff WSH · TE	@MIA	SIT	0.1	–	85	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.4 (TE51)✓
TE	Josiah Deguara ARI · TE	vsSF	SIT	0.0	–	86	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 8% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE61)✓
TE	Teagan Quitoriano ATL · TE	vsCAR	SIT	-0.1	–	87	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE81)✓
TE	Feleipe Franks ATL · TE	vsCAR	SIT	-0.2	–	88	tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE63)✓
TE	Thomas Fidone II NYG · TE	vsGB	SIT	-0.2	–	89	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE89)✓
TE	Chris Manhertz NYG · TE	vsGB	SIT	-0.2	–	90	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE56)✓
TE	Devin Culp TB · TE	@BUF	SIT	-0.2	–	91	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 5% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE74)✓
TE	Stone Smartt NYJ · TE	@NE	SIT	-0.4	–	92	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE70)✓

Trey McBridevs SFSTART16.8

ARI

Matchup math20.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 28%
Snap share: 87%
Opp-weighted DvP: 20.2

Brock Bowersvs DALSTART12.4

Matchup math13.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 19%
Snap share: 81%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.7

Cade Otton@ BUFSTART12.0

Matchup math15.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE: 3.5
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 23%
Snap share: 98%
Opp-weighted DvP: 15.5

Kyle Pitts Sr.vs CARSTART11.8

ATL

Matchup math18.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE: 4.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 22%
Snap share: 90%
Opp-weighted DvP: 18.4

Dallas Goedertvs DETSTART11.3

PHI

Matchup math13.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 19%
Snap share: 84%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.1

Harold Fannin Jr.vs BALSTART11.2

CLE

Matchup math13.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 18%
Snap share: 76%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.8

Oronde Gadsden II@ JAXSTART10.8

LAC

Matchup math12.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE: 4.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 13%
Snap share: 72%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.0

Theo Johnsonvs GBFLEX10.8

NYG

Matchup math15.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE: 4.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 19%
Snap share: 92%
Opp-weighted DvP: 15.4

Dalton Schultz@ TENFLEX10.7

HOU

Matchup math8.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE: 3.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 14%
Snap share: 73%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.7

Travis Kelce@ DENFLEX10.6

Matchup math13.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE: 4.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 15%
Snap share: 77%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.3

George Kittle@ ARIFLEX9.8

Matchup math11.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 15%
Snap share: 87%
Opp-weighted DvP: 11.1

Zach Ertz@ MIAFLEX9.6

WSH

Matchup math14.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE: 5.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 14%
Snap share: 68%
Opp-weighted DvP: 14.2

Colston Loveland@ MINFLEX9.2

CHI

Matchup math8.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 73%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.8

Michael Mayervs DALFLEX9.1

Matchup math11.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 16%
Snap share: 83%
Opp-weighted DvP: 11.5

David Njokuvs BALFLEX8.7

CLE

Matchup math8.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 67%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.0

Mark Andrews@ CLESIT8.4

BAL

Matchup math7.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 63%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.0

Jake Ferguson@ LVSIT8.3

DAL

Matchup math7.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 71%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.8

Pat Freiermuthvs CINSIT8.2

PIT

Matchup math8.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE: 6.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 51%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.4

Mason Taylor@ NESIT8.0

NYJ

Matchup math12.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE: 4.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 15%
Snap share: 86%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.0

Hunter Henryvs NYJSIT7.9

Matchup math9.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 77%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.2

T.J. Hockensonvs CHISIT7.7

MIN

Matchup math8.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE: 4.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 83%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.5

Tyler Higbeevs SEASIT7.3

LAR

Matchup math6.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE: 4.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 53%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.2

Jonnu Smithvs CINSIT6.8

PIT

Matchup math9.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE: 6.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 59%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.0

Evan Engramvs KCSIT6.7

DEN

Matchup math6.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE: 4.4
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 49%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.3

AJ Barner@ LARSIT6.4

SEA

Matchup math7.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE: 5.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 71%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.0

✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade

Rookies: no rated call yet

Building NFL history. Track their weekly usage in the Rookie Tracker →

Player	Matchup	Call	Why
Keleki Latu BUF· TE	vs TB	rookie, building history	Rookie, building history (0/2 games). No rated call yet.

Keleki Latu

BUF· TE

Matchup: vs TB
Call: rookie, building history

Why

Rookie, building history (0/2 games). No rated call yet.