FFM

Home Matchups Utilization Articles

2026 · Wk 8

Week 81 of 14 final

Sun 1:00p

Insights

Research any player, explore trends.

Weekly Draft Role change Reliable starts Rookies Schedule

▾▾

83 players · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why	Finish
TE	David Njoku CLE · TE	@WSH	12.7	–	1	soft matchup Matchup math12.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 12.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.4 (TE40)
TE	Trey McBride ARI · TE	@SF	11.4	–	2	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 21% Snap share 88% Opp-weighted DvP 16.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.3 (TE13)
TE	Jake Ferguson DAL · TE	@PIT	10.8	–	3	soft matchup Matchup math13.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 68% Opp-weighted DvP 13.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	13.0 (TE8)
TE	George Kittle SF · TE	vsARI	10.1	–	4	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 88% Opp-weighted DvP 13.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	20.4 (TE3)
TE	Brock Bowers LV · TE	@DEN	9.8	–	5	soft matchup Matchup math15.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 15.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	23.7 (TE2)
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	vsNO	9.7	–	6	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 86% Opp-weighted DvP 13.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.0 (TE5)
TE	Cade Otton TB · TE	@ATL	9.2	–	7	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math12.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 93% Opp-weighted DvP 12.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.4 (TE23)
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	vsMIA	9.2	–	8	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 77% Opp-weighted DvP 16.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.2 (TE27)
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	vsDAL	9.0	–	9	soft matchup Matchup math10.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 72% Opp-weighted DvP 10.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.2 (TE19)
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	vsGB	8.7	–	10	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math12.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 89% Opp-weighted DvP 12.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	12.2 (TE10)
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	vsCAR	8.4	–	11	soft matchup Matchup math8.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 74% Opp-weighted DvP 8.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.7 (TE20)
TE	Tucker Kraft GB · TE	@LAR	8.2	–	12	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 82% Opp-weighted DvP 12.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	24.8 (TE1)
TE	Tyler Conklin NYJ · TE	@MIN	8.1	–	13	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math10.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 10.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.5 (TE12)
TE	Dalton Kincaid BUF · TE	@HOU	8.0	–	14	soft matchup Matchup math10.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 10.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.4 (TE26)
TE	Isaiah Likely BAL · TE	@CIN	7.6	–	15	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math9.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 58% Opp-weighted DvP 9.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.3 (TE4)
TE	Zach Ertz WSH · TE	vsCLE	7.6	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 67% Opp-weighted DvP 8.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.0 (TE36)
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	vsBUF	7.4	–	17	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 84% Opp-weighted DvP 7.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.4 (TE22)
TE	Kyle Pitts ATL · TE	vsTB	7.3	–	18	projected outside startable range Matchup math12.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 77% Opp-weighted DvP 12.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	15.8 (TE6)
TE	Mike Gesicki CIN · TE	vsBAL	7.0	–	19	limited usage Matchup math5.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 5.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.1 (TE29)
TE	Noah Fant SEA · TE	vsNYG	6.6	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 64% Opp-weighted DvP 5.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.4 (TE25)
TE	Brenton Strange JAX · TE	vsIND	6.3	–	21	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 62% Opp-weighted DvP 6.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	12.4 (TE9)
TE	Johnny Mundt MIN · TE	vsNYJ	5.8	–	22	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 6.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.1 (TE28)
TE	Jordan Akins CLE · TE	@WSH	5.7	–	23	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 4.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.2 (TE14)
TE	Austin Hooper NE · TE	vsMIA	5.3	–	24	low total Matchup math6.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 6.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.9 (TE42)
TE	Tommy Tremble CAR · TE	@CHI	5.2	–	25	low total Matchup math5.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 76% Opp-weighted DvP 5.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	-0.3 (TE83)
TE	Erick All Jr. CIN · TE	vsBAL	5.0	–	26	limited usage Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 43% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.0 (TE37)
TE	Jonnu Smith MIA · TE	@NE	4.9	–	27	limited usage Matchup math3.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 3.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.1 (TE15)
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	@CIN	4.7	–	28	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 5.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.5 (TE17)
TE	Theo Johnson NYG · TE	@SEA	4.7	–	29	low total Matchup math4.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 4.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.8 (TE16)
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	vsNO	4.6	–	30	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.9 (TE30)
TE	Lucas Krull DEN · TE	vsLV	4.6	–	31	limited usage Matchup math3.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 3.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE47)
TE	Foster Moreau NO · TE	@KC	4.3	–	32	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 4.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.3 (TE18)
TE	Pharaoh Brown SEA · TE	vsNYG	4.0	–	33	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 2.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE45)
TE	Elijah Higgins ARI · TE	@SF	3.9	–	34	limited usage Matchup math2.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.2 (TE24)
TE	Josh Oliver MIN · TE	vsNYJ	3.5	–	35	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 2.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE59)
TE	Juwan Johnson NO · TE	@KC	3.4	–	36	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.1 (TE21)
TE	Dawson Knox BUF · TE	@HOU	3.3	–	37	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE60)
TE	Eric Saubert SF · TE	vsARI	3.2	–	38	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE54)
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	@PIT	3.2	–	39	limited usage Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE43)
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	vsDAL	3.1	–	40	projected outside startable range Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE48)
TE	Ja'Tavion Sanders CAR · TE	@CHI	3.1	–	41	limited usage, low total Matchup math1.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 47% Opp-weighted DvP 1.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.3 (TE31)
TE	Jeremy Ruckert NYJ · TE	@MIN	3.1	–	42	limited usage Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 37% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE72)
TE	Julian Hill MIA · TE	@NE	2.8	–	43	limited usage Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 47% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE76)
TE	Drew Sample CIN · TE	vsBAL	2.8	–	44	tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE58)
TE	Kylen Granson IND · TE	@JAX	2.8	–	45	limited usage Matchup math1.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 48% Opp-weighted DvP 1.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE64)
TE	AJ Barner SEA · TE	vsNYG	2.8	–	46	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.3 (TE41)
TE	Luke Farrell JAX · TE	vsIND	2.7	–	47	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.7 (TE34)
TE	Durham Smythe MIA · TE	@NE	2.7	–	48	limited usage Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE56)
TE	Gerald Everett CHI · TE	vsCAR	2.6	–	49	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.2 (TE32)
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	vsCLE	2.5	–	50	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE67)
TE	Robert Tonyan MIN · TE	vsNYJ	2.5	–	51	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE53)
TE	Davis Allen LAR · TE	vsGB	2.4	–	52	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE79)
TE	Will Mallory IND · TE	@JAX	2.3	–	53	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE46)
TE	Mo Alie-Cox IND · TE	@JAX	2.3	–	54	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.7 (TE11)
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	vsLV	2.0	–	55	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 48% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.9 (TE38)
TE	Drew Ogletree IND · TE	@JAX	1.9	–	56	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE50)
TE	GS Geoff Swaim CLE · TE	@WSH	1.9	–	57	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE55)
TE	Nate Adkins DEN · TE	vsLV	1.8	–	58	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE44)
TE	Harrison Bryant LV · TE	@DEN	1.7	–	59	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE65)
TE	Charlie Kolar BAL · TE	@CIN	1.7	–	60	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	15.6 (TE7)
TE	Charlie Woerner ATL · TE	vsTB	1.7	–	61	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE63)
TE	Blake Whiteheart CLE · TE	@WSH	1.6	–	62	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE74)
TE	Cade Stover HOU · TE	vsBUF	1.5	–	63	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.6 (TE39)
TE	Tanner Conner MIA · TE	@NE	1.3	–	64	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE66)
TE	Tip Reiman ARI · TE	@SF	1.2	–	65	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 42% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE49)
TE	Daniel Bellinger NYG · TE	@SEA	1.0	–	66	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE73)
TE	Chris Manhertz NYG · TE	@SEA	1.0	–	67	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 39% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE52)
TE	Ben Sinnott WSH · TE	vsCLE	1.0	–	68	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE81)
TE	Payne Durham TB · TE	@ATL	1.0	–	69	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE77)
TE	Jared Wiley KC · TE	vsNO	0.9	–	70	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE80)
TE	Brevyn Spann-Ford DAL · TE	@PIT	0.8	–	71	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 20% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.0 (TE33)
TE	Hunter Long LAR · TE	vsGB	0.7	–	72	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.6 (TE35)
TE	Josiah Deguara JAX · TE	vsIND	0.6	–	73	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 11% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.2 (TE51)
TE	Marcedes Lewis CHI · TE	vsCAR	0.6	–	74	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE82)
TE	Jake Tonges SF · TE	vsARI	0.4	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 8% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE70)
TE	Quintin Morris BUF · TE	@HOU	0.3	–	76	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 13% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE68)
TE	Ben Sims GB · TE	@LAR	0.2	–	77	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE78)
TE	Feleipe Franks CAR · TE	@CHI	0.0	–	78	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE62)
TE	Ross Dwelley ATL · TE	vsTB	0.0	–	79	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE57)
TE	Brenden Bates NYJ · TE	@MIN	0.0	–	80	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 8% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE75)
TE	RW Rodney Williams PIT · TE	vsDAL	0.0	–	81	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE69)
TE	Colson Yankoff WSH · TE	vsCLE	-0.1	–	82	tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE71)
TE	Ko Kieft TB · TE	@ATL	-0.1	–	83	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE61)

David Njoku@ WSH12.7

CLE

Matchup math12.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE: 3.4
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 16%
Snap share: 71%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.8

Trey McBride@ SF11.4

ARI

Matchup math16.9

Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE: 3.5
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 21%
Snap share: 88%
Opp-weighted DvP: 16.9

Jake Ferguson@ PIT10.8

DAL

Matchup math13.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 15%
Snap share: 68%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.0

George Kittlevs ARI10.1

Matchup math13.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE: 3.5
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 17%
Snap share: 88%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.8

Brock Bowers@ DEN9.8

Matchup math15.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE: 5.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 13%
Snap share: 71%
Opp-weighted DvP: 15.6

Travis Kelcevs NO9.7

Matchup math13.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 16%
Snap share: 86%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.4

Cade Otton@ ATL9.2

Matchup math12.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 14%
Snap share: 93%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.8

Hunter Henryvs MIA9.2

Matchup math16.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE: 4.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 16%
Snap share: 77%
Opp-weighted DvP: 16.3

Pat Freiermuthvs DAL9.0

PIT

Matchup math10.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE: 3.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 14%
Snap share: 72%
Opp-weighted DvP: 10.5

Colby Parkinsonvs GB8.7

LAR

Matchup math12.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 14%
Snap share: 89%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.7

Cole Kmetvs CAR8.4

CHI

Matchup math8.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 74%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.4

Tucker Kraft@ LAR8.2

Matchup math12.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE: 4.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 82%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.5

Tyler Conklin@ MIN8.1

NYJ

Matchup math10.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 92%
Opp-weighted DvP: 10.5

Dalton Kincaid@ HOU8.0

BUF

Matchup math10.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE: 4.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 61%
Opp-weighted DvP: 10.4

Isaiah Likely@ CIN7.6

BAL

Matchup math9.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE: 5.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 58%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.8

Zach Ertzvs CLE7.6

WSH

Matchup math8.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE: 3.5
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 67%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.4

Dalton Schultzvs BUF7.4

HOU

Matchup math7.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 84%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.4

Kyle Pittsvs TB7.3

ATL

Matchup math12.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE: 5.4
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 77%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.8

Mike Gesickivs BAL7.0

CIN

Matchup math5.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 6%
Snap share: 41%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.2

Noah Fantvs NYG6.6

SEA

Matchup math5.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE: 3.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 64%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.3

Brenton Strangevs IND6.3

JAX

Matchup math6.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 62%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.0

Johnny Mundtvs NYJ5.8

MIN

Matchup math6.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE: 3.8
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 66%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.6

Jordan Akins@ WSH5.7

CLE

Matchup math4.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE: 3.4
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 5%
Snap share: 55%
Opp-weighted DvP: 4.1

Austin Hoopervs MIA5.3

Matchup math6.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE: 4.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 6%
Snap share: 56%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.2

Tommy Tremble@ CHI5.2

CAR

Matchup math5.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE: 3.8
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 76%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.7

Finish = actual points scored and the player's positional finish rank that week.

ADP · usage context · sleeper and bust flags: draft-prep researchDraft Board →

Stat leaderboards, as-of-week cuts, and moreFull Stat Explorer →

Insights

Research any player, explore trends.

Weekly Draft Role change Reliable starts Rookies Schedule

▾▾

83 players · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why	Finish
TE	David Njoku CLE · TE	@WSH	12.7	–	1	soft matchup Matchup math12.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 12.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.4 (TE40)
TE	Trey McBride ARI · TE	@SF	11.4	–	2	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 21% Snap share 88% Opp-weighted DvP 16.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.3 (TE13)
TE	Jake Ferguson DAL · TE	@PIT	10.8	–	3	soft matchup Matchup math13.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 68% Opp-weighted DvP 13.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	13.0 (TE8)
TE	George Kittle SF · TE	vsARI	10.1	–	4	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 88% Opp-weighted DvP 13.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	20.4 (TE3)
TE	Brock Bowers LV · TE	@DEN	9.8	–	5	soft matchup Matchup math15.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 15.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	23.7 (TE2)
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	vsNO	9.7	–	6	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 86% Opp-weighted DvP 13.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.0 (TE5)
TE	Cade Otton TB · TE	@ATL	9.2	–	7	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math12.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 93% Opp-weighted DvP 12.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.4 (TE23)
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	vsMIA	9.2	–	8	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 77% Opp-weighted DvP 16.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.2 (TE27)
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	vsDAL	9.0	–	9	soft matchup Matchup math10.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 72% Opp-weighted DvP 10.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.2 (TE19)
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	vsGB	8.7	–	10	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math12.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 89% Opp-weighted DvP 12.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	12.2 (TE10)
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	vsCAR	8.4	–	11	soft matchup Matchup math8.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 74% Opp-weighted DvP 8.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.7 (TE20)
TE	Tucker Kraft GB · TE	@LAR	8.2	–	12	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 82% Opp-weighted DvP 12.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	24.8 (TE1)
TE	Tyler Conklin NYJ · TE	@MIN	8.1	–	13	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math10.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 10.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.5 (TE12)
TE	Dalton Kincaid BUF · TE	@HOU	8.0	–	14	soft matchup Matchup math10.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 10.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.4 (TE26)
TE	Isaiah Likely BAL · TE	@CIN	7.6	–	15	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math9.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 58% Opp-weighted DvP 9.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.3 (TE4)
TE	Zach Ertz WSH · TE	vsCLE	7.6	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 67% Opp-weighted DvP 8.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.0 (TE36)
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	vsBUF	7.4	–	17	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 84% Opp-weighted DvP 7.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.4 (TE22)
TE	Kyle Pitts ATL · TE	vsTB	7.3	–	18	projected outside startable range Matchup math12.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 77% Opp-weighted DvP 12.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	15.8 (TE6)
TE	Mike Gesicki CIN · TE	vsBAL	7.0	–	19	limited usage Matchup math5.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 5.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.1 (TE29)
TE	Noah Fant SEA · TE	vsNYG	6.6	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 64% Opp-weighted DvP 5.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.4 (TE25)
TE	Brenton Strange JAX · TE	vsIND	6.3	–	21	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 62% Opp-weighted DvP 6.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	12.4 (TE9)
TE	Johnny Mundt MIN · TE	vsNYJ	5.8	–	22	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 6.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.1 (TE28)
TE	Jordan Akins CLE · TE	@WSH	5.7	–	23	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 4.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.2 (TE14)
TE	Austin Hooper NE · TE	vsMIA	5.3	–	24	low total Matchup math6.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 6.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.9 (TE42)
TE	Tommy Tremble CAR · TE	@CHI	5.2	–	25	low total Matchup math5.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 76% Opp-weighted DvP 5.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	-0.3 (TE83)
TE	Erick All Jr. CIN · TE	vsBAL	5.0	–	26	limited usage Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 43% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.0 (TE37)
TE	Jonnu Smith MIA · TE	@NE	4.9	–	27	limited usage Matchup math3.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 3.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.1 (TE15)
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	@CIN	4.7	–	28	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 5.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.5 (TE17)
TE	Theo Johnson NYG · TE	@SEA	4.7	–	29	low total Matchup math4.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 4.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.8 (TE16)
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	vsNO	4.6	–	30	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.9 (TE30)
TE	Lucas Krull DEN · TE	vsLV	4.6	–	31	limited usage Matchup math3.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 3.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE47)
TE	Foster Moreau NO · TE	@KC	4.3	–	32	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 4.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.3 (TE18)
TE	Pharaoh Brown SEA · TE	vsNYG	4.0	–	33	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 2.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE45)
TE	Elijah Higgins ARI · TE	@SF	3.9	–	34	limited usage Matchup math2.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.2 (TE24)
TE	Josh Oliver MIN · TE	vsNYJ	3.5	–	35	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 2.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE59)
TE	Juwan Johnson NO · TE	@KC	3.4	–	36	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.1 (TE21)
TE	Dawson Knox BUF · TE	@HOU	3.3	–	37	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE60)
TE	Eric Saubert SF · TE	vsARI	3.2	–	38	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE54)
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	@PIT	3.2	–	39	limited usage Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE43)
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	vsDAL	3.1	–	40	projected outside startable range Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE48)
TE	Ja'Tavion Sanders CAR · TE	@CHI	3.1	–	41	limited usage, low total Matchup math1.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 47% Opp-weighted DvP 1.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.3 (TE31)
TE	Jeremy Ruckert NYJ · TE	@MIN	3.1	–	42	limited usage Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 37% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE72)
TE	Julian Hill MIA · TE	@NE	2.8	–	43	limited usage Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 47% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE76)
TE	Drew Sample CIN · TE	vsBAL	2.8	–	44	tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE58)
TE	Kylen Granson IND · TE	@JAX	2.8	–	45	limited usage Matchup math1.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 48% Opp-weighted DvP 1.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE64)
TE	AJ Barner SEA · TE	vsNYG	2.8	–	46	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.3 (TE41)
TE	Luke Farrell JAX · TE	vsIND	2.7	–	47	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.7 (TE34)
TE	Durham Smythe MIA · TE	@NE	2.7	–	48	limited usage Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE56)
TE	Gerald Everett CHI · TE	vsCAR	2.6	–	49	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.2 (TE32)
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	vsCLE	2.5	–	50	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE67)
TE	Robert Tonyan MIN · TE	vsNYJ	2.5	–	51	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE53)
TE	Davis Allen LAR · TE	vsGB	2.4	–	52	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE79)
TE	Will Mallory IND · TE	@JAX	2.3	–	53	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE46)
TE	Mo Alie-Cox IND · TE	@JAX	2.3	–	54	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.7 (TE11)
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	vsLV	2.0	–	55	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 48% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.9 (TE38)
TE	Drew Ogletree IND · TE	@JAX	1.9	–	56	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE50)
TE	GS Geoff Swaim CLE · TE	@WSH	1.9	–	57	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE55)
TE	Nate Adkins DEN · TE	vsLV	1.8	–	58	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE44)
TE	Harrison Bryant LV · TE	@DEN	1.7	–	59	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE65)
TE	Charlie Kolar BAL · TE	@CIN	1.7	–	60	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	15.6 (TE7)
TE	Charlie Woerner ATL · TE	vsTB	1.7	–	61	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE63)
TE	Blake Whiteheart CLE · TE	@WSH	1.6	–	62	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE74)
TE	Cade Stover HOU · TE	vsBUF	1.5	–	63	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.6 (TE39)
TE	Tanner Conner MIA · TE	@NE	1.3	–	64	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE66)
TE	Tip Reiman ARI · TE	@SF	1.2	–	65	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 42% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE49)
TE	Daniel Bellinger NYG · TE	@SEA	1.0	–	66	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE73)
TE	Chris Manhertz NYG · TE	@SEA	1.0	–	67	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 39% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE52)
TE	Ben Sinnott WSH · TE	vsCLE	1.0	–	68	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE81)
TE	Payne Durham TB · TE	@ATL	1.0	–	69	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 25% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE77)
TE	Jared Wiley KC · TE	vsNO	0.9	–	70	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE80)
TE	Brevyn Spann-Ford DAL · TE	@PIT	0.8	–	71	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 20% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.0 (TE33)
TE	Hunter Long LAR · TE	vsGB	0.7	–	72	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.6 (TE35)
TE	Josiah Deguara JAX · TE	vsIND	0.6	–	73	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 11% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.2 (TE51)
TE	Marcedes Lewis CHI · TE	vsCAR	0.6	–	74	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE82)
TE	Jake Tonges SF · TE	vsARI	0.4	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 8% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE70)
TE	Quintin Morris BUF · TE	@HOU	0.3	–	76	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 13% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE68)
TE	Ben Sims GB · TE	@LAR	0.2	–	77	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE78)
TE	Feleipe Franks CAR · TE	@CHI	0.0	–	78	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE62)
TE	Ross Dwelley ATL · TE	vsTB	0.0	–	79	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE57)
TE	Brenden Bates NYJ · TE	@MIN	0.0	–	80	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 8% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE75)
TE	RW Rodney Williams PIT · TE	vsDAL	0.0	–	81	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE69)
TE	Colson Yankoff WSH · TE	vsCLE	-0.1	–	82	tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE71)
TE	Ko Kieft TB · TE	@ATL	-0.1	–	83	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE61)