Start / Sit

Accountable start/sit calls you can verify.

Back-test your league. See how our calls would've scored on your actual Sleeper team.Connect →

77% hit across 15,216 callsSee the record →

▾▾

82 calls · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Call	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why	Finish
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	@BUF	START	15.8	–	1	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math19.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 25% Snap share 81% Opp-weighted DvP 19.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.8 (TE37)✗
TE	Brock Bowers LV · TE	@MIA	START	13.8	–	2	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math22.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 24% Snap share 86% Opp-weighted DvP 22.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	31.3 (TE1)✓
TE	David Njoku CLE · TE	@NO	START	12.7	–	3	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math14.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 18% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 14.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	19.1 (TE3)✓
TE	Evan Engram JAX · TE	@DET	START	11.5	–	4	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 21% Snap share 76% Opp-weighted DvP 16.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.8 (TE19)✗
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	vsLAR	START	10.9	–	5	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math19.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 18% Snap share 87% Opp-weighted DvP 19.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	12.3 (TE7)✓
TE	Will Dissly LAC · TE	vsCIN	START	10.8	–	6	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math20.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 20.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	18.0 (TE6)✓
TE	Jake Ferguson DAL · TE	vsHOU	START	9.9	–	7	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math11.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 77% Opp-weighted DvP 11.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.1 (TE39)✗
TE	Zach Ertz WSH · TE	@PHI	FLEX	9.8	–	8	soft matchup Matchup math10.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 10.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	18.7 (TE4)✓
TE	Jonnu Smith MIA · TE	vsLV	FLEX	9.5	–	9	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math11.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 57% Opp-weighted DvP 11.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	28.1 (TE2)✓
TE	Dallas Goedert PHI · TE	vsWSH	FLEX	9.3	–	10	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math8.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 8.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.1 (TE10)✓
TE	T.J. Hockenson MIN · TE	@TEN	FLEX	9.0	–	11	soft matchup Matchup math6.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 6.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE34)✗
TE	Tucker Kraft GB · TE	@CHI	FLEX	8.7	–	12	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math10.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 90% Opp-weighted DvP 10.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE80)✗
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	@PIT	FLEX	8.5	–	13	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math9.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 9.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.2 (TE26)✗
TE	Mike Gesicki CIN · TE	@LAC	FLEX	8.5	–	14	soft matchup Matchup math6.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 48% Opp-weighted DvP 6.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE59)✗
TE	Kyle Pitts ATL · TE	@DEN	FLEX	8.4	–	15	soft matchup Matchup math9.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 57% Opp-weighted DvP 9.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.9 (TE41)✗
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	@DAL	SIT	8.0	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 72% Opp-weighted DvP 7.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.3 (TE13)✓
TE	Josh Oliver MIN · TE	@TEN	SIT	6.5	–	17	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 4.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.4 (TE23)✓
TE	Tyler Conklin NYJ · TE	vsIND	SIT	6.5	–	18	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 81% Opp-weighted DvP 7.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE44)✓
TE	Juwan Johnson NO · TE	vsCLE	SIT	6.5	–	19	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 60% Opp-weighted DvP 5.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	12.0 (TE8)✗
TE	Grant Calcaterra PHI · TE	vsWSH	SIT	6.4	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 80% Opp-weighted DvP 8.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE66)✓
TE	Isaiah Likely BAL · TE	@PIT	SIT	6.2	–	21	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 6.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.5 (TE11)✗
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	vsGB	SIT	6.1	–	22	low total Matchup math7.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 86% Opp-weighted DvP 7.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.2 (TE22)✓
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	vsBAL	SIT	6.0	–	23	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 70% Opp-weighted DvP 6.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.4 (TE32)✓
TE	Chig Okonkwo TEN · TE	vsMIN	SIT	5.9	–	24	low total Matchup math5.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 62% Opp-weighted DvP 5.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.9 (TE27)✓
TE	Austin Hooper NE · TE	vsLAR	SIT	5.8	–	25	limited usage Matchup math6.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 47% Opp-weighted DvP 6.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.5 (TE20)✓
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	@BUF	SIT	5.2	–	26	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 4.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	18.3 (TE5)✗
TE	Michael Mayer LV · TE	@MIA	SIT	5.2	–	27	low total Matchup math4.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 58% Opp-weighted DvP 4.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE52)✓
TE	Dawson Knox BUF · TE	vsKC	SIT	5.1	–	28	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 4.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.0 (TE18)✓
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	vsATL	SIT	4.9	–	29	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 60% Opp-weighted DvP 3.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE60)✓
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	vsBAL	SIT	4.8	–	30	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 4.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.2 (TE24)✓
TE	AJ Barner SEA · TE	@SF	SIT	4.8	–	31	limited usage Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 50% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.5 (TE31)✓
TE	Foster Moreau NO · TE	vsCLE	SIT	4.7	–	32	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 75% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.0 (TE17)✓
TE	Davis Allen LAR · TE	@NE	SIT	4.0	–	33	limited usage Matchup math2.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE78)✓
TE	Tanner Hudson CIN · TE	@LAC	SIT	3.9	–	34	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE33)✓
TE	Johnny Mundt MIN · TE	@TEN	SIT	3.9	–	35	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.3 (TE38)✓
TE	Cade Stover HOU · TE	@DAL	SIT	3.9	–	36	limited usage Matchup math2.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 2.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.5 (TE30)✓
TE	Lucas Krull DEN · TE	vsATL	SIT	3.9	–	37	limited usage Matchup math2.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 33% Opp-weighted DvP 2.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE71)✓
TE	Brenton Strange JAX · TE	@DET	SIT	3.5	–	38	limited usage, low total Matchup math2.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 2.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE49)✓
TE	Josh Whyle TEN · TE	vsMIN	SIT	3.5	–	39	limited usage, low total Matchup math1.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE47)✓
TE	Julian Hill MIA · TE	vsLV	SIT	3.5	–	40	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 48% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.8 (TE25)✓
TE	Drew Sample CIN · TE	@LAC	SIT	3.3	–	41	projected outside startable range Matchup math1.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 1.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE51)✓
TE	Nick Vannett TEN · TE	vsMIN	SIT	3.2	–	42	limited usage, low total Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE45)✓
TE	Kylen Granson IND · TE	@NYJ	SIT	3.1	–	43	limited usage Matchup math1.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.4 (TE53)✓
TE	Jordan Akins CLE · TE	@NO	SIT	3.1	–	44	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.9 (TE36)✓
TE	Jeremy Ruckert NYJ · TE	vsIND	SIT	3.0	–	45	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE48)✓
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	@NE	SIT	2.8	–	46	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 47% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.9 (TE12)✗
TE	Brock Wright DET · TE	vsJAX	SIT	2.8	–	47	tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.5 (TE21)✓
TE	Charlie Kolar BAL · TE	@PIT	SIT	2.4	–	48	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 33% Opp-weighted DvP 1.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE65)✓
TE	Kenny Yeboah NYJ · TE	vsIND	SIT	2.4	–	49	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 29% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.1 (TE16)✓
TE	Ben Sims GB · TE	@CHI	SIT	2.2	–	50	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE74)✓
TE	James Mitchell DET · TE	vsJAX	SIT	2.2	–	51	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 39% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE73)✓
TE	Ben Sinnott WSH · TE	@PHI	SIT	2.1	–	52	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE81)✓
TE	Jack Stoll MIA · TE	vsLV	SIT	2.0	–	53	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 47% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE63)✓
TE	Mo Alie-Cox IND · TE	@NYJ	SIT	1.9	–	54	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.7 (TE28)✓
TE	Durham Smythe MIA · TE	vsLV	SIT	1.9	–	55	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.3 (TE54)✓
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	@PHI	SIT	1.9	–	56	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.7 (TE29)✓
TE	Hunter Long LAR · TE	@NE	SIT	1.8	–	57	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE64)✓
TE	Luke Farrell JAX · TE	@DET	SIT	1.8	–	58	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.3 (TE55)✓
TE	Gerald Everett CHI · TE	vsGB	SIT	1.8	–	59	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE62)✓
TE	Drew Ogletree IND · TE	@NYJ	SIT	1.7	–	60	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE42)✓
TE	Nate Adkins DEN · TE	vsATL	SIT	1.6	–	61	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.2 (TE15)✓
TE	Stone Smartt LAC · TE	vsCIN	SIT	1.1	–	62	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE69)✓
TE	Geoff Swaim CLE · TE	@NO	SIT	1.1	–	63	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE58)✓
TE	Peyton Hendershot KC · TE	@BUF	SIT	1.0	–	64	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.1 (TE40)✓
TE	Quintin Morris BUF · TE	vsKC	SIT	0.9	–	65	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 16% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE68)✓
TE	Brevyn Spann-Ford DAL · TE	vsHOU	SIT	0.9	–	66	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 20% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.2 (TE14)✓
TE	Shane Zylstra DET · TE	vsJAX	SIT	0.9	–	67	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.2 (TE35)✓
TE	Eric Saubert SF · TE	vsSEA	SIT	0.8	–	68	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 23% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE43)✓
TE	C.J. Uzomah PHI · TE	vsWSH	SIT	0.8	–	69	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 14% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE56)✓
TE	Teagan Quitoriano HOU · TE	@DAL	SIT	0.8	–	70	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE76)✓
TE	Tucker Fisk LAC · TE	vsCIN	SIT	0.8	–	71	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 23% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE46)✓
TE	Marcedes Lewis CHI · TE	vsGB	SIT	0.6	–	72	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 18% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE82)✓
TE	Brayden Willis SF · TE	vsSEA	SIT	0.6	–	73	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 14% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE72)✓
TE	Pharaoh Brown SEA · TE	@SF	SIT	0.5	–	74	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 20% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE57)✓
TE	John FitzPatrick GB · TE	@CHI	SIT	0.5	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE77)✓
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	vsHOU	SIT	0.4	–	76	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 13% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.6 (TE9)✗
TE	Jaheim Bell NE · TE	vsLAR	SIT	0.2	–	77	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 5% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE79)✓
TE	Jake Tonges SF · TE	vsSEA	SIT	0.2	–	78	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE70)✓
TE	Dallin Holker NO · TE	vsCLE	SIT	0.1	–	79	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE75)✓
TE	Ross Dwelley ATL · TE	@DEN	SIT	0.0	–	80	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE50)✓
TE	Josiah Deguara JAX · TE	@DET	SIT	-0.3	–	81	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE61)✓
TE	Princeton Fant DAL · TE	vsHOU	SIT	-0.3	–	82	low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE67)✓

Travis Kelce@ BUFSTART15.8

Matchup math19.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 25%
Snap share: 81%
Opp-weighted DvP: 19.2

Brock Bowers@ MIASTART13.8

Matchup math22.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE: 4.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 24%
Snap share: 86%
Opp-weighted DvP: 22.1

David Njoku@ NOSTART12.7

CLE

Matchup math14.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 18%
Snap share: 79%
Opp-weighted DvP: 14.3

Evan Engram@ DETSTART11.5

JAX

Matchup math16.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE: 3.5
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 21%
Snap share: 76%
Opp-weighted DvP: 16.0

Hunter Henryvs LARSTART10.9

Matchup math19.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE: 4.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 18%
Snap share: 87%
Opp-weighted DvP: 19.4

Will Disslyvs CINSTART10.8

LAC

Matchup math20.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE: 5.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 16%
Snap share: 66%
Opp-weighted DvP: 20.8

Jake Fergusonvs HOUSTART9.9

DAL

Matchup math11.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 14%
Snap share: 77%
Opp-weighted DvP: 11.6

Zach Ertz@ PHIFLEX9.8

WSH

Matchup math10.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 13%
Snap share: 65%
Opp-weighted DvP: 10.3

Jonnu Smithvs LVFLEX9.5

MIA

Matchup math11.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE: 4.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 57%
Opp-weighted DvP: 11.1

Dallas Goedertvs WSHFLEX9.3

PHI

Matchup math8.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 54%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.4

T.J. Hockenson@ TENFLEX9.0

MIN

Matchup math6.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE: 3.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 56%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.5

Tucker Kraft@ CHIFLEX8.7

Matchup math10.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 90%
Opp-weighted DvP: 10.0

Mark Andrews@ PITFLEX8.5

BAL

Matchup math9.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 66%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.6

Mike Gesicki@ LACFLEX8.5

CIN

Matchup math6.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE: 4.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 48%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.5

Kyle Pitts@ DENFLEX8.4

ATL

Matchup math9.9

Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE: 5.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 57%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.9

Dalton Schultz@ DALSIT8.0

HOU

Matchup math7.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE: 3.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 72%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.7

Josh Oliver@ TENSIT6.5

MIN

Matchup math4.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE: 3.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 63%
Opp-weighted DvP: 4.6

Tyler Conklinvs INDSIT6.5

NYJ

Matchup math7.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE: 4.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 81%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.0

Juwan Johnsonvs CLESIT6.5

Matchup math5.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE: 3.4
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 60%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.3

Grant Calcaterravs WSHSIT6.4

PHI

Matchup math8.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 80%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.1

Isaiah Likely@ PITSIT6.2

BAL

Matchup math6.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 56%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.5

Cole Kmetvs GBSIT6.1

CHI

Matchup math7.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 86%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.3

Pat Freiermuthvs BALSIT6.0

PIT

Matchup math6.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 70%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.6

Chig Okonkwovs MINSIT5.9

TEN

Matchup math5.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 62%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.3

Austin Hoopervs LARSIT5.8

Matchup math6.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE: 4.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 6%
Snap share: 47%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.0

✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade

Rookies: no rated call yet

Building NFL history. Track their weekly usage in the Rookie Tracker →

Player	Matchup	Call	Why
Cam Grandy CIN· TE	vs LAC	rookie, building history	Rookie, building history (1/2 games). No rated call yet.
TM Tyler Mabry SEA· TE	vs SF	rookie, building history	Rookie, building history (0/2 games). No rated call yet.
Zach Davidson BUF· TE	vs KC	rookie, building history	Rookie, building history (0/2 games). No rated call yet.

Cam Grandy

CIN· TE

Matchup: vs LAC
Call: rookie, building history

Why

Rookie, building history (1/2 games). No rated call yet.

Tyler Mabry

SEA· TE

Matchup: vs SF
Call: rookie, building history

Why

Rookie, building history (0/2 games). No rated call yet.

Zach Davidson

BUF· TE

Matchup: vs KC
Call: rookie, building history

Why

Rookie, building history (0/2 games). No rated call yet.