Home My Leagues Following Insights Analysis

2026 · Wk 2

Start / Sit

Accountable start/sit calls you can verify.

Back-test your league. See how our calls would've scored on your actual Sleeper team.Connect →

77% hit across 15,216 callsSee the record →

▾▾

77 calls · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Call	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why	Finish
TE	Brock Bowers LV · TE	vsDEN	START	15.9	–	1	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math27.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 28% Snap share 90% Opp-weighted DvP 27.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.8 (TE19)✗
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	@CAR	START	15.6	–	2	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math18.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 24% Snap share 82% Opp-weighted DvP 18.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	12.2 (TE12)✓
TE	Cade Otton TB · TE	@NYG	START	14.8	–	3	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math14.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 2.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 26% Snap share 96% Opp-weighted DvP 14.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.0 (TE29)✗
TE	David Njoku CLE · TE	vsPIT	START	12.8	–	4	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math13.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 82% Opp-weighted DvP 13.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.9 (TE31)✗
TE	Trey McBride ARI · TE	@SEA	START	12.1	–	5	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math17.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 23% Snap share 88% Opp-weighted DvP 17.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	25.3 (TE1)✓
TE	George Kittle SF · TE	@GB	START	11.3	–	6	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 21% Snap share 91% Opp-weighted DvP 16.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	20.2 (TE4)✓
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	@MIA	START	10.8	–	7	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math16.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 18% Snap share 87% Opp-weighted DvP 16.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.4 (TE16)✗
TE	Zach Ertz WSH · TE	vsDAL	FLEX	10.7	–	8	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math9.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 70% Opp-weighted DvP 9.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	15.8 (TE7)✓
TE	Jonnu Smith MIA · TE	vsNE	FLEX	9.8	–	9	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math8.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 8.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	23.7 (TE2)✓
TE	Will Dissly LAC · TE	vsBAL	FLEX	9.3	–	10	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math10.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 14% Snap share 62% Opp-weighted DvP 10.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.7 (TE17)✗
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	vsTEN	FLEX	9.2	–	11	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math7.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 7.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.0 (TE28)✗
TE	Sam LaPorta DET · TE	@IND	FLEX	9.1	–	12	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math13.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 80% Opp-weighted DvP 13.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.9 (TE23)✗
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	@LAC	FLEX	7.9	–	13	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math7.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 68% Opp-weighted DvP 7.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	15.6 (TE8)✓
TE	Tucker Kraft GB · TE	vsSF	FLEX	7.9	–	14	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math7.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 93% Opp-weighted DvP 7.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	10.6 (TE14)✗
TE	Theo Johnson NYG · TE	vsTB	FLEX	7.8	–	15	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math13.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 91% Opp-weighted DvP 13.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.9 (TE20)✗
TE	Dallas Goedert PHI · TE	@LAR	SIT	7.6	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 8.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.9 (TE22)✓
TE	T.J. Hockenson MIN · TE	@CHI	SIT	7.4	–	17	limited usage Matchup math4.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 4.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	18.4 (TE5)✗
TE	Ja'Tavion Sanders CAR · TE	vsKC	SIT	7.2	–	18	low total Matchup math9.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 71% Opp-weighted DvP 9.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.9 (TE18)✓
TE	Isaiah Likely BAL · TE	@LAC	SIT	6.4	–	19	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 5.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE66)✓
TE	AJ Barner SEA · TE	vsARI	SIT	6.2	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 5.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.9 (TE24)✓
TE	Chig Okonkwo TEN · TE	@HOU	SIT	6.1	–	21	low total Matchup math5.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 5.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	14.0 (TE10)✗
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	@CAR	SIT	5.8	–	22	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 69% Opp-weighted DvP 4.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	22.6 (TE3)✗
TE	Grant Calcaterra PHI · TE	@LAR	SIT	5.8	–	23	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 75% Opp-weighted DvP 7.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE57)✓
TE	Austin Hooper NE · TE	@MIA	SIT	5.6	–	24	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 5.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	15.9 (TE6)✗
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	@CLE	SIT	5.5	–	25	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 4.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.4 (TE27)✓
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	vsMIN	SIT	5.3	–	26	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 88% Opp-weighted DvP 4.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	13.4 (TE11)✗
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	@CLE	SIT	5.3	–	27	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 4.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.9 (TE15)✓
TE	Julian Hill MIA · TE	vsNE	SIT	4.4	–	28	limited usage Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE37)✓
TE	Michael Mayer LV · TE	vsDEN	SIT	4.4	–	29	low total Matchup math3.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 4.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 3.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.1 (TE34)✓
TE	Davis Allen LAR · TE	vsPHI	SIT	4.4	–	30	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 60% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE71)✓
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	@LV	SIT	4.2	–	31	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.3 (TE43)✓
TE	Tommy Tremble CAR · TE	vsKC	SIT	4.2	–	32	low total Matchup math3.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 3.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE41)✓
TE	Cade Stover HOU · TE	vsTEN	SIT	4.1	–	33	limited usage Matchup math1.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 1.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.6 (TE13)✓
TE	Jordan Akins CLE · TE	vsPIT	SIT	4.0	–	34	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.8 (TE21)✓
TE	Elijah Higgins ARI · TE	@SEA	SIT	3.6	–	35	limited usage Matchup math2.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 2.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE42)✓
TE	Brock Wright DET · TE	@IND	SIT	3.4	–	36	projected outside startable range Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 60% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.4 (TE25)✓
TE	Kylen Granson IND · TE	vsDET	SIT	3.3	–	37	limited usage Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE55)✓
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	@WSH	SIT	3.2	–	38	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	14.5 (TE9)✗
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	vsDAL	SIT	2.9	–	39	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.3 (TE45)✓
TE	Josh Whyle TEN · TE	@HOU	SIT	2.5	–	40	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math1.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 1.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE63)✓
TE	Mo Alie-Cox IND · TE	vsDET	SIT	2.5	–	41	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 43% Opp-weighted DvP 1.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE51)✓
TE	Brevyn Spann-Ford DAL · TE	@WSH	SIT	2.5	–	42	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.4 (TE26)✓
TE	Nick Vannett TEN · TE	@HOU	SIT	2.5	–	43	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE49)✓
TE	Lucas Krull DEN · TE	@LV	SIT	2.4	–	44	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 29% Opp-weighted DvP 1.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE64)✓
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	vsPHI	SIT	2.3	–	45	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.0 (TE35)✓
TE	Durham Smythe MIA · TE	vsNE	SIT	2.3	–	46	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 0.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE36)✓
TE	Johnny Mundt MIN · TE	@CHI	SIT	2.2	–	47	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE38)✓
TE	Nate Adkins DEN · TE	@LV	SIT	2.2	–	48	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 43% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE70)✓
TE	Tip Reiman ARI · TE	@SEA	SIT	2.0	–	49	tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 52% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE75)✓
TE	Charlie Kolar BAL · TE	@LAC	SIT	1.9	–	50	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 28% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE40)✓
TE	Drew Ogletree IND · TE	vsDET	SIT	1.8	–	51	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 39% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE76)✓
TE	MyCole Pruitt PIT · TE	@CLE	SIT	1.7	–	52	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 38% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE46)✓
TE	Blake Whiteheart CLE · TE	vsPIT	SIT	1.7	–	53	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 0.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.9 (TE32)✓
TE	Ben Sims GB · TE	vsSF	SIT	1.6	–	54	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE68)✓
TE	Hunter Long LAR · TE	vsPHI	SIT	1.5	–	55	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 31% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE56)✓
TE	Eric Saubert SF · TE	@GB	SIT	1.4	–	56	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE50)✓
TE	Gerald Everett CHI · TE	vsMIN	SIT	1.4	–	57	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE52)✓
TE	Tucker Fisk LAC · TE	vsBAL	SIT	1.4	–	58	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.7 (TE39)✓
TE	Shane Zylstra DET · TE	@IND	SIT	1.3	–	59	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE73)✓
TE	Peyton Hendershot KC · TE	@CAR	SIT	1.3	–	60	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE61)✓
TE	Ben Sinnott WSH · TE	vsDAL	SIT	1.2	–	61	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 23% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE74)✓
TE	Stone Smartt LAC · TE	vsBAL	SIT	1.2	–	62	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE60)✓
TE	Chris Manhertz NYG · TE	vsTB	SIT	1.1	–	63	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 22% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE47)✓
TE	Teagan Quitoriano HOU · TE	vsTEN	SIT	0.8	–	64	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE69)✓
TE	Pharaoh Brown SEA · TE	vsARI	SIT	0.8	–	65	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.9 (TE30)✓
TE	Payne Durham TB · TE	@NYG	SIT	0.8	–	66	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 2.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.6 (TE33)✓
TE	John FitzPatrick GB · TE	vsSF	SIT	0.6	–	67	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.2 (TE44)✓
TE	Jaheim Bell NE · TE	@MIA	SIT	0.5	–	68	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE72)✓
TE	Daniel Bellinger NYG · TE	vsTB	SIT	0.4	–	69	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 12% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE67)✓
TE	Marcedes Lewis CHI · TE	vsMIN	SIT	0.3	–	70	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 18% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE77)✓
TE	C.J. Uzomah PHI · TE	@LAR	SIT	0.2	–	71	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 5.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 6% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE48)✓
TE	Nick Muse MIN · TE	@CHI	SIT	0.2	–	72	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE59)✓
TE	Brayden Willis SF · TE	@GB	SIT	0.2	–	73	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 12% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE65)✓
TE	Ko Kieft TB · TE	@NYG	SIT	0.0	–	74	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 2.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE53)✓
TE	Jake Tonges SF · TE	@GB	SIT	-0.2	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE62)✓
TE	Princeton Fant DAL · TE	@WSH	SIT	-0.3	–	76	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE58)✓
TE	Feleipe Franks CAR · TE	vsKC	SIT	-0.3	–	77	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 1% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE54)✓

Brock Bowersvs DENSTART15.9

Matchup math27.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE: 4.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 28%
Snap share: 90%
Opp-weighted DvP: 27.0

Travis Kelce@ CARSTART15.6

Matchup math18.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 24%
Snap share: 82%
Opp-weighted DvP: 18.4

Cade Otton@ NYGSTART14.8

Matchup math14.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE: 2.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 26%
Snap share: 96%
Opp-weighted DvP: 14.5

David Njokuvs PITSTART12.8

CLE

Matchup math13.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 17%
Snap share: 82%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.1

Trey McBride@ SEASTART12.1

ARI

Matchup math17.9

Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 23%
Snap share: 88%
Opp-weighted DvP: 17.9

George Kittle@ GBSTART11.3

Matchup math16.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 21%
Snap share: 91%
Opp-weighted DvP: 16.0

Hunter Henry@ MIASTART10.8

Matchup math16.9

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE: 4.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 18%
Snap share: 87%
Opp-weighted DvP: 16.9

Zach Ertzvs DALFLEX10.7

WSH

Matchup math9.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE: 3.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 15%
Snap share: 70%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.6

Jonnu Smithvs NEFLEX9.8

MIA

Matchup math8.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 65%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.8

Will Disslyvs BALFLEX9.3

LAC

Matchup math10.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 14%
Snap share: 62%
Opp-weighted DvP: 10.4

Dalton Schultzvs TENFLEX9.2

HOU

Matchup math7.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE: 3.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 13%
Snap share: 71%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.7

Sam LaPorta@ INDFLEX9.1

DET

Matchup math13.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE: 4.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 16%
Snap share: 80%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.2

Mark Andrews@ LACFLEX7.9

BAL

Matchup math7.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE: 4.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 68%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.8

Tucker Kraftvs SFFLEX7.9

Matchup math7.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 93%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.3

Theo Johnsonvs TBFLEX7.8

NYG

Matchup math13.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE: 5.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 91%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.4

Dallas Goedert@ LARSIT7.6

PHI

Matchup math8.9

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE: 5.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 55%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.9

T.J. Hockenson@ CHISIT7.4

MIN

Matchup math4.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 46%
Opp-weighted DvP: 4.8

Ja'Tavion Sandersvs KCSIT7.2

CAR

Matchup math9.9

Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE: 4.3
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 71%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.9

Isaiah Likely@ LACSIT6.4

BAL

Matchup math5.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE: 4.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 52%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.6

AJ Barnervs ARISIT6.2

SEA

Matchup math5.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 63%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.1

Chig Okonkwo@ HOUSIT6.1

TEN

Matchup math5.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 65%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.8

Noah Gray@ CARSIT5.8

Matchup math4.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 6%
Snap share: 69%
Opp-weighted DvP: 4.3

Grant Calcaterra@ LARSIT5.8

PHI

Matchup math7.9

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE: 5.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 75%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.9

Austin Hooper@ MIASIT5.6

Matchup math5.3

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE: 4.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 6%
Snap share: 51%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.3

Darnell Washington@ CLESIT5.5

PIT

Matchup math4.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE: 3.5
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 6%
Snap share: 55%
Opp-weighted DvP: 4.1

✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade

Rookies: no rated call yet

Building NFL history. Track their weekly usage in the Rookie Tracker →

Player	Matchup	Call	Why
Jack Westover NE· TE	vs MIA	rookie, building history	Rookie, building history (0/2 games). No rated call yet.
TM Tyler Mabry SEA· TE	vs ARI	rookie, building history	Rookie, building history (1/2 games). No rated call yet.

Jack Westover

NE· TE

Matchup: vs MIA
Call: rookie, building history

Why

Rookie, building history (0/2 games). No rated call yet.

Tyler Mabry

SEA· TE

Matchup: vs ARI
Call: rookie, building history

Why

Rookie, building history (1/2 games). No rated call yet.