FFM

Home Matchups Utilization Articles

2026 · Wk 8

Week 81 of 14 final

Sun 1:00p

Insights

Research any player, explore trends.

Weekly Draft Role change Reliable starts Rookies Schedule

▾▾

79 players · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why	Finish
TE	Trey McBride ARI · TE	vsLAR	12.1	–	1	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math20.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 20.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	18.7 (TE3)
TE	Sam LaPorta DET · TE	vsTB	11.2	–	2	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math20.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 20.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE29)
TE	George Kittle SF · TE	@MIN	10.2	–	3	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 90% Opp-weighted DvP 12.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	20.6 (TE1)
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	vsCHI	10.1	–	4	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 12.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.1 (TE24)
TE	Dallas Goedert PHI · TE	vsATL	9.9	–	5	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 74% Opp-weighted DvP 12.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.8 (TE14)
TE	Juwan Johnson NO · TE	@DAL	9.6	–	6	soft matchup Matchup math8.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 8.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE57)
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	vsCIN	9.6	–	7	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math16.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 82% Opp-weighted DvP 16.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE41)
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	vsSEA	9.2	–	8	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math13.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 13.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	18.9 (TE2)
TE	Isaiah Likely BAL · TE	vsLV	8.8	–	9	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math7.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 7.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE22)
TE	Tucker Kraft GB · TE	vsIND	8.5	–	10	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math9.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 90% Opp-weighted DvP 9.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.6 (TE26)
TE	Dalton Kincaid BUF · TE	@MIA	7.9	–	11	soft matchup Matchup math8.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 8.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.3 (TE13)
TE	Tyler Conklin NYJ · TE	@TEN	7.9	–	12	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math6.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 82% Opp-weighted DvP 6.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.0 (TE38)
TE	Johnny Mundt MIN · TE	vsSF	7.7	–	13	soft matchup Matchup math6.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 62% Opp-weighted DvP 6.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.2 (TE31)
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	vsLV	7.6	–	14	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math6.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 6.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.1 (TE9)
TE	Chig Okonkwo TEN · TE	vsNYJ	7.5	–	15	soft matchup Matchup math8.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 8.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE21)
TE	Gerald Everett CHI · TE	@HOU	7.4	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 6.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.1 (TE35)
TE	Austin Hooper NE · TE	vsSEA	7.3	–	17	low total Matchup math9.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 9.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE43)
TE	Kyle Pitts ATL · TE	@PHI	7.2	–	18	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 76% Opp-weighted DvP 7.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.0 (TE19)
TE	Zach Ertz WSH · TE	vsNYG	7.1	–	19	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 5.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	10.2 (TE7)
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	@ARI	6.9	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 5.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.2 (TE33)
TE	Mike Gesicki CIN · TE	@KC	6.8	–	21	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 60% Opp-weighted DvP 7.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.1 (TE4)
TE	Durham Smythe MIA · TE	vsBUF	6.7	–	22	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 69% Opp-weighted DvP 5.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE40)
TE	Cade Otton TB · TE	@DET	6.6	–	23	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 93% Opp-weighted DvP 6.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	-0.4 (TE79)
TE	Jonnu Smith MIA · TE	vsBUF	6.5	–	24	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 5.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.3 (TE5)
TE	Tommy Tremble CAR · TE	vsLAC	6.5	–	25	low total Matchup math8.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 78% Opp-weighted DvP 8.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.3 (TE18)
TE	Michael Mayer LV · TE	@BAL	6.5	–	26	low total Matchup math5.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 75% Opp-weighted DvP 5.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.1 (TE36)
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	vsCIN	5.8	–	27	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 6.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE64)
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	@DEN	5.6	–	28	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 8.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.9 (TE11)
TE	Kylen Granson IND · TE	@GB	5.6	–	29	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 4.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.9 (TE39)
TE	Hayden Hurst LAC · TE	@CAR	5.3	–	30	limited usage Matchup math3.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 3.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE44)
TE	Jordan Akins CLE · TE	@JAX	5.1	–	31	limited usage Matchup math3.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 3.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.0 (TE37)
TE	Luke Musgrave GB · TE	vsIND	5.0	–	32	limited usage Matchup math2.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 2.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE42)
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	@HOU	5.0	–	33	limited usage Matchup math4.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 4.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.7 (TE15)
TE	Noah Fant SEA · TE	@NE	4.7	–	34	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.4 (TE32)
TE	Drew Sample CIN · TE	@KC	4.7	–	35	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.8 (TE17)
TE	Daniel Bellinger NYG · TE	@WSH	4.7	–	36	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 3.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE72)
TE	Mo Alie-Cox IND · TE	@GB	4.4	–	37	limited usage Matchup math3.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 3.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.2 (TE30)
TE	Foster Moreau NO · TE	@DAL	4.4	–	38	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 58% Opp-weighted DvP 3.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE54)
TE	Josh Oliver MIN · TE	vsSF	4.2	–	39	limited usage Matchup math2.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 2.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE56)
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	vsNYG	4.1	–	40	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE45)
TE	Elijah Higgins ARI · TE	vsLAR	4.0	–	41	limited usage Matchup math2.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 2.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.8 (TE10)
TE	Dawson Knox BUF · TE	@MIA	4.0	–	42	limited usage Matchup math2.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE58)
TE	Greg Dulcich DEN · TE	vsPIT	3.9	–	43	limited usage, low total Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE23)
TE	Brevin Jordan HOU · TE	vsCHI	3.6	–	44	limited usage Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.4 (TE47)
TE	Charlie Kolar BAL · TE	vsLV	3.4	–	45	limited usage Matchup math1.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.4 (TE46)
TE	Will Dissly LAC · TE	@CAR	2.9	–	46	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 37% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.9 (TE16)
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	vsPIT	2.7	–	47	limited usage, low total Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE55)
TE	Brock Wright DET · TE	vsTB	2.6	–	48	limited usage Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE65)
TE	Jeremy Ruckert NYJ · TE	@TEN	2.6	–	49	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE71)
TE	Josh Whyle TEN · TE	vsNYJ	2.6	–	50	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE28)
TE	Stone Smartt LAC · TE	@CAR	2.6	–	51	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE69)
TE	Grant Calcaterra PHI · TE	vsATL	2.5	–	52	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.9 (TE25)
TE	Julian Hill MIA · TE	vsBUF	2.4	–	53	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE74)
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	@DEN	2.4	–	54	tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 57% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.5 (TE12)
TE	MyCole Pruitt PIT · TE	@DEN	2.3	–	55	limited usage Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE49)
TE	Charlie Woerner ATL · TE	@PHI	2.2	–	56	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE60)
TE	Peyton Hendershot KC · TE	vsCIN	2.2	–	57	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE70)
TE	Harrison Bryant LV · TE	@BAL	2.1	–	58	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 37% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE61)
TE	Drew Ogletree IND · TE	@GB	1.8	–	59	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.2 (TE34)
TE	Eric Saubert SF · TE	@MIN	1.6	–	60	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE20)
TE	Brenton Strange JAX · TE	vsCLE	1.5	–	61	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.5 (TE8)
TE	Nick Vannett TEN · TE	vsNYJ	1.5	–	62	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE51)
TE	Marcedes Lewis CHI · TE	@HOU	1.4	–	63	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 35% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE78)
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	vsNO	1.3	–	64	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 29% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	10.3 (TE6)
TE	Luke Farrell JAX · TE	vsCLE	1.1	–	65	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE27)
TE	Ko Kieft TB · TE	@DET	1.0	–	66	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE59)
TE	PH Parker Hesse DET · TE	vsTB	1.0	–	67	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 23% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE53)
TE	Ben Sims GB · TE	vsIND	1.0	–	68	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE76)
TE	Chris Manhertz NYG · TE	@WSH	0.9	–	69	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE50)
TE	Jordan Matthews CAR · TE	vsLAC	0.8	–	70	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE48)
TE	Payne Durham TB · TE	@DET	0.8	–	71	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE75)
TE	Hunter Long LAR · TE	@ARI	0.6	–	72	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE63)
TE	Nick Muse MIN · TE	vsSF	0.3	–	73	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE68)
TE	Tanner Conner MIA · TE	vsBUF	0.3	–	74	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE62)
TE	Quintin Morris BUF · TE	@MIA	0.1	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE67)
TE	Nate Adkins DEN · TE	vsPIT	0.1	–	76	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 12% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE77)
TE	Princeton Fant DAL · TE	vsNO	0.0	–	77	tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE66)
TE	Ross Dwelley ATL · TE	@PHI	-0.1	–	78	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE52)
TE	Blake Whiteheart CLE · TE	@JAX	-0.2	–	79	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE73)

Trey McBridevs LAR12.1

ARI

Matchup math20.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE: 4.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 22%
Snap share: 92%
Opp-weighted DvP: 20.1

Sam LaPortavs TB11.2

DET

Matchup math20.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE: 5.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 17%
Snap share: 79%
Opp-weighted DvP: 20.1

George Kittle@ MIN10.2

Matchup math12.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 17%
Snap share: 90%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.4

Dalton Schultzvs CHI10.1

HOU

Matchup math12.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 15%
Snap share: 79%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.0

Dallas Goedertvs ATL9.9

PHI

Matchup math12.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE: 4.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 16%
Snap share: 74%
Opp-weighted DvP: 12.8

Juwan Johnson@ DAL9.6

Matchup math8.1

Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE: 3.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 56%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.1

Travis Kelcevs CIN9.6

Matchup math16.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE: 5.8
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 15%
Snap share: 82%
Opp-weighted DvP: 16.8

Hunter Henryvs SEA9.2

Matchup math13.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 17%
Snap share: 79%
Opp-weighted DvP: 13.5

Isaiah Likelyvs LV8.8

BAL

Matchup math7.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 59%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.5

Tucker Kraftvs IND8.5

Matchup math9.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 13%
Snap share: 90%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.8

Dalton Kincaid@ MIA7.9

BUF

Matchup math8.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE: 4.5
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 59%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.8

Tyler Conklin@ TEN7.9

NYJ

Matchup math6.4

Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE: 3.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 82%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.4

Johnny Mundtvs SF7.7

MIN

Matchup math6.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 62%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.8

Mark Andrewsvs LV7.6

BAL

Matchup math6.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 54%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.7

Chig Okonkwovs NYJ7.5

TEN

Matchup math8.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE: 4.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 11%
Snap share: 65%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.7

Gerald Everett@ HOU7.4

CHI

Matchup math6.9

Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE: 4.4
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 51%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.9

Austin Hoopervs SEA7.3

Matchup math9.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 12%
Snap share: 79%
Opp-weighted DvP: 9.0

Kyle Pitts@ PHI7.2

ATL

Matchup math7.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE: 4.1
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 10%
Snap share: 76%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.8

Zach Ertzvs NYG7.1

WSH

Matchup math5.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE: 3.2
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 61%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.5

Colby Parkinson@ ARI6.9

LAR

Matchup math5.5

Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 65%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.5

Mike Gesicki@ KC6.8

CIN

Matchup math7.2

Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE: 4.0
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 60%
Opp-weighted DvP: 7.2

Durham Smythevs BUF6.7

MIA

Matchup math5.7

Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 8%
Snap share: 69%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.7

Cade Otton@ DET6.6

Matchup math6.8

Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE: 3.9
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 93%
Opp-weighted DvP: 6.8

Jonnu Smithvs BUF6.5

MIA

Matchup math5.0

Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE: 3.7
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 7%
Snap share: 59%
Opp-weighted DvP: 5.0

Tommy Tremblevs LAC6.5

CAR

Matchup math8.6

Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE: 4.6
Opportunity share · snap × target share: 9%
Snap share: 78%
Opp-weighted DvP: 8.6

Finish = actual points scored and the player's positional finish rank that week.

ADP · usage context · sleeper and bust flags: draft-prep researchDraft Board →

Stat leaderboards, as-of-week cuts, and moreFull Stat Explorer →

Insights

Research any player, explore trends.

Weekly Draft Role change Reliable starts Rookies Schedule

▾▾

79 players · click a column to sort

Pos	Player	Matchup	Proj	Def	Rank ▲	Why	Finish
TE	Trey McBride ARI · TE	vsLAR	12.1	–	1	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math20.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 22% Snap share 92% Opp-weighted DvP 20.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	18.7 (TE3)
TE	Sam LaPorta DET · TE	vsTB	11.2	–	2	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math20.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 20.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE29)
TE	George Kittle SF · TE	@MIN	10.2	–	3	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 90% Opp-weighted DvP 12.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	20.6 (TE1)
TE	Dalton Schultz HOU · TE	vsCHI	10.1	–	4	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 12.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.1 (TE24)
TE	Dallas Goedert PHI · TE	vsATL	9.9	–	5	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math12.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 16% Snap share 74% Opp-weighted DvP 12.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.8 (TE14)
TE	Juwan Johnson NO · TE	@DAL	9.6	–	6	soft matchup Matchup math8.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 56% Opp-weighted DvP 8.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE57)
TE	Travis Kelce KC · TE	vsCIN	9.6	–	7	heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math16.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 15% Snap share 82% Opp-weighted DvP 16.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE41)
TE	Hunter Henry NE · TE	vsSEA	9.2	–	8	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math13.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 17% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 13.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	18.9 (TE2)
TE	Isaiah Likely BAL · TE	vsLV	8.8	–	9	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math7.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 7.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE22)
TE	Tucker Kraft GB · TE	vsIND	8.5	–	10	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math9.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 13% Snap share 90% Opp-weighted DvP 9.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.6 (TE26)
TE	Dalton Kincaid BUF · TE	@MIA	7.9	–	11	soft matchup Matchup math8.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 8.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.3 (TE13)
TE	Tyler Conklin NYJ · TE	@TEN	7.9	–	12	heavy usage, soft matchup Matchup math6.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 82% Opp-weighted DvP 6.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.0 (TE38)
TE	Johnny Mundt MIN · TE	vsSF	7.7	–	13	soft matchup Matchup math6.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 62% Opp-weighted DvP 6.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.2 (TE31)
TE	Mark Andrews BAL · TE	vsLV	7.6	–	14	high-scoring game, soft matchup Matchup math6.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 54% Opp-weighted DvP 6.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.1 (TE9)
TE	Chig Okonkwo TEN · TE	vsNYJ	7.5	–	15	soft matchup Matchup math8.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 11% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 8.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE21)
TE	Gerald Everett CHI · TE	@HOU	7.4	–	16	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 6.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.1 (TE35)
TE	Austin Hooper NE · TE	vsSEA	7.3	–	17	low total Matchup math9.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SEA allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 12% Snap share 79% Opp-weighted DvP 9.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE43)
TE	Kyle Pitts ATL · TE	@PHI	7.2	–	18	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 10% Snap share 76% Opp-weighted DvP 7.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.0 (TE19)
TE	Zach Ertz WSH · TE	vsNYG	7.1	–	19	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 61% Opp-weighted DvP 5.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	10.2 (TE7)
TE	Colby Parkinson LAR · TE	@ARI	6.9	–	20	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 65% Opp-weighted DvP 5.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.2 (TE33)
TE	Mike Gesicki CIN · TE	@KC	6.8	–	21	projected outside startable range Matchup math7.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 60% Opp-weighted DvP 7.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	16.1 (TE4)
TE	Durham Smythe MIA · TE	vsBUF	6.7	–	22	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 69% Opp-weighted DvP 5.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.8 (TE40)
TE	Cade Otton TB · TE	@DET	6.6	–	23	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 93% Opp-weighted DvP 6.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	-0.4 (TE79)
TE	Jonnu Smith MIA · TE	vsBUF	6.5	–	24	projected outside startable range Matchup math5.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 7% Snap share 59% Opp-weighted DvP 5.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	11.3 (TE5)
TE	Tommy Tremble CAR · TE	vsLAC	6.5	–	25	low total Matchup math8.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 9% Snap share 78% Opp-weighted DvP 8.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.3 (TE18)
TE	Michael Mayer LV · TE	@BAL	6.5	–	26	low total Matchup math5.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 75% Opp-weighted DvP 5.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.1 (TE36)
TE	Noah Gray KC · TE	vsCIN	5.8	–	27	projected outside startable range Matchup math6.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 6.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE64)
TE	Pat Freiermuth PIT · TE	@DEN	5.6	–	28	projected outside startable range Matchup math8.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 8% Snap share 66% Opp-weighted DvP 8.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.9 (TE11)
TE	Kylen Granson IND · TE	@GB	5.6	–	29	projected outside startable range Matchup math4.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 55% Opp-weighted DvP 4.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.9 (TE39)
TE	Hayden Hurst LAC · TE	@CAR	5.3	–	30	limited usage Matchup math3.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 3.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE44)
TE	Jordan Akins CLE · TE	@JAX	5.1	–	31	limited usage Matchup math3.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 3.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.0 (TE37)
TE	Luke Musgrave GB · TE	vsIND	5.0	–	32	limited usage Matchup math2.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 2.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.6 (TE42)
TE	Cole Kmet CHI · TE	@HOU	5.0	–	33	limited usage Matchup math4.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 6% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 4.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	6.7 (TE15)
TE	Noah Fant SEA · TE	@NE	4.7	–	34	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g NE allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 3.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.4 (TE32)
TE	Drew Sample CIN · TE	@KC	4.7	–	35	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g KC allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 63% Opp-weighted DvP 3.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.8 (TE17)
TE	Daniel Bellinger NYG · TE	@WSH	4.7	–	36	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 53% Opp-weighted DvP 3.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE72)
TE	Mo Alie-Cox IND · TE	@GB	4.4	–	37	limited usage Matchup math3.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 5% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 3.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.2 (TE30)
TE	Foster Moreau NO · TE	@DAL	4.4	–	38	projected outside startable range Matchup math3.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g DAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 58% Opp-weighted DvP 3.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE54)
TE	Josh Oliver MIN · TE	vsSF	4.2	–	39	limited usage Matchup math2.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 45% Opp-weighted DvP 2.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE56)
TE	John Bates WSH · TE	vsNYG	4.1	–	40	projected outside startable range Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYG allows to TE 3.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 4% Snap share 51% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.5 (TE45)
TE	Elijah Higgins ARI · TE	vsLAR	4.0	–	41	limited usage Matchup math2.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAR allows to TE 4.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 2.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	8.8 (TE10)
TE	Dawson Knox BUF · TE	@MIA	4.0	–	42	limited usage Matchup math2.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 49% Opp-weighted DvP 2.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE58)
TE	Greg Dulcich DEN · TE	vsPIT	3.9	–	43	limited usage, low total Matchup math2.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 3% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 2.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE23)
TE	Brevin Jordan HOU · TE	vsCHI	3.6	–	44	limited usage Matchup math1.7 Raw DvP · PPR/g CHI allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 44% Opp-weighted DvP 1.7 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.4 (TE47)
TE	Charlie Kolar BAL · TE	vsLV	3.4	–	45	limited usage Matchup math1.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g LV allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 40% Opp-weighted DvP 1.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	1.4 (TE46)
TE	Will Dissly LAC · TE	@CAR	2.9	–	46	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 37% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	5.9 (TE16)
TE	Adam Trautman DEN · TE	vsPIT	2.7	–	47	limited usage, low total Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 46% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE55)
TE	Brock Wright DET · TE	vsTB	2.6	–	48	limited usage Matchup math1.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 1.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE65)
TE	Jeremy Ruckert NYJ · TE	@TEN	2.6	–	49	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g TEN allows to TE 3.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE71)
TE	Josh Whyle TEN · TE	vsNYJ	2.6	–	50	limited usage Matchup math1.6 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 2% Snap share 34% Opp-weighted DvP 1.6 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE28)
TE	Stone Smartt LAC · TE	@CAR	2.6	–	51	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g CAR allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE69)
TE	Grant Calcaterra PHI · TE	vsATL	2.5	–	52	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g ATL allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 26% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.9 (TE25)
TE	Julian Hill MIA · TE	vsBUF	2.4	–	53	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.9 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 0.9 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE74)
TE	Darnell Washington PIT · TE	@DEN	2.4	–	54	tough matchup Matchup math1.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 57% Opp-weighted DvP 1.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	7.5 (TE12)
TE	MyCole Pruitt PIT · TE	@DEN	2.3	–	55	limited usage Matchup math1.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g DEN allows to TE 5.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 36% Opp-weighted DvP 1.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE49)
TE	Charlie Woerner ATL · TE	@PHI	2.2	–	56	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math1.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 41% Opp-weighted DvP 1.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE60)
TE	Peyton Hendershot KC · TE	vsCIN	2.2	–	57	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g CIN allows to TE 5.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 19% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE70)
TE	Harrison Bryant LV · TE	@BAL	2.1	–	58	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.8 Raw DvP · PPR/g BAL allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 37% Opp-weighted DvP 0.8 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE61)
TE	Drew Ogletree IND · TE	@GB	1.8	–	59	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g GB allows to TE 3.8 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	2.2 (TE34)
TE	Eric Saubert SF · TE	@MIN	1.6	–	60	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIN allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	4.6 (TE20)
TE	Brenton Strange JAX · TE	vsCLE	1.5	–	61	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.4 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 30% Opp-weighted DvP 0.4 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	9.5 (TE8)
TE	Nick Vannett TEN · TE	vsNYJ	1.5	–	62	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.5 Raw DvP · PPR/g NYJ allows to TE 4.2 Opportunity share · snap × target share 1% Snap share 24% Opp-weighted DvP 0.5 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE51)
TE	Marcedes Lewis CHI · TE	@HOU	1.4	–	63	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g HOU allows to TE 4.4 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 35% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE78)
TE	Luke Schoonmaker DAL · TE	vsNO	1.3	–	64	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 29% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	10.3 (TE6)
TE	Luke Farrell JAX · TE	vsCLE	1.1	–	65	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.2 Raw DvP · PPR/g CLE allows to TE 3.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.2 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	3.3 (TE27)
TE	Ko Kieft TB · TE	@DET	1.0	–	66	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE59)
TE	PH Parker Hesse DET · TE	vsTB	1.0	–	67	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g TB allows to TE 5.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 23% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE53)
TE	Ben Sims GB · TE	vsIND	1.0	–	68	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g IND allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 27% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE76)
TE	Chris Manhertz NYG · TE	@WSH	0.9	–	69	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g WSH allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 32% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE50)
TE	Jordan Matthews CAR · TE	vsLAC	0.8	–	70	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.3 Raw DvP · PPR/g LAC allows to TE 4.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.3 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE48)
TE	Payne Durham TB · TE	@DET	0.8	–	71	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.1 Raw DvP · PPR/g DET allows to TE 3.9 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 17% Opp-weighted DvP 0.1 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE75)
TE	Hunter Long LAR · TE	@ARI	0.6	–	72	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g ARI allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 21% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE63)
TE	Nick Muse MIN · TE	vsSF	0.3	–	73	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g SF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 3% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE68)
TE	Tanner Conner MIA · TE	vsBUF	0.3	–	74	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g BUF allows to TE 3.7 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 9% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE62)
TE	Quintin Morris BUF · TE	@MIA	0.1	–	75	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g MIA allows to TE 4.5 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 7% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE67)
TE	Nate Adkins DEN · TE	vsPIT	0.1	–	76	limited usage, low total, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PIT allows to TE 4.3 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 12% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE77)
TE	Princeton Fant DAL · TE	vsNO	0.0	–	77	tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g NO allows to TE 3.6 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 0% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE66)
TE	Ross Dwelley ATL · TE	@PHI	-0.1	–	78	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g PHI allows to TE 4.1 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 4% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE52)
TE	Blake Whiteheart CLE · TE	@JAX	-0.2	–	79	limited usage, tough matchup Matchup math0.0 Raw DvP · PPR/g JAX allows to TE 4.0 Opportunity share · snap × target share 0% Snap share 2% Opp-weighted DvP 0.0 Raw matchup re-weighted by how much this player is on the field and involved vs positional peers — the value behind the soft/tough read. Descriptive, not a model input.	0.0 (TE73)