Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 3, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–3 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.530Elite | 19.4 | 41% | 110 |
| 2 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.525Elite | 24.5 | 38% | 140 |
| 3 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.441Elite | 18.8 | 26% | 128 |
| 4 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.400Elite | 22.8 | 29% | 171 |
| 5 |  Rome OdunzeWR CHI | 0.341Solid | 20.9 | 28% | 184 |
| 6 |  Zay FlowersWR BAL | 0.333Solid | 15.4 | 33% | 139 |
| 7 |  Quentin JohnstonWRLAC | 0.324Solid | 18.6 | — | 172 |
| 8 |  Tre TuckerWR LV | 0.323Solid | 19.7 | — | 183 |
| 9 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.321Solid | 15.0 | 24% | 140 |
| 10 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.316Solid | 18.6 | 39% | 177 |
| 11 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.314Solid | 16.7 | 27% | 159 |
| 12 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.311Solid | 13.6 | 25% | 131 |
| 13 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.303Solid | 13.2 | — | 131 |
| 14 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.293Rotational | 17.0 | — | 174 |
| 15 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.289Rotational | 15.4 | 31% | 160 |
| 16 |  Wan'Dale RobinsonWR NYG | 0.289Rotational | 14.4 | — | 150 |
| 17 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.287Rotational | 15.8 | — | 165 |
| 18 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.279Rotational | 14.0 | 29% | 151 |
| 19 |  Malik NabersWRNYG | 0.278Rotational | 17.7 | 31% | 191 |
| 20 |  Courtland SuttonWR DEN | 0.274Rotational | 14.5 | 24% | 159 |
| 21 |  Tyquan ThorntonWR KC | 0.265Rotational | 12.7 | — | 144 |
| 22 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.263Rotational | 12.7 | — | 145 |
| 23 |  Troy FranklinWRDEN | 0.263Rotational | 11.7 | — | 134 |
| 24 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.256Rotational | 12.8 | 31% | 150 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.530Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 41%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 110
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.525Elite
- PPR per game
- 24.5
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 140
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.441Elite
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 128
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.400Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 171
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.341Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.9
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 184
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.333Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 139
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.324Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 172
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.323Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 183
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.321Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 140
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.6
- Target share
- 39%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 177
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 159
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 131
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 131
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.293Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 160
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 150
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.287Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 165
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 151
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.278Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.7
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 191
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 159
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.265Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 144
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.263Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 145
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.263Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 134
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.256Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 150
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →