Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 4, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–4 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.545Elite | 27.4 | 38% | 201 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.437Elite | 17.8 | 36% | 163 |
| 3 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.420Elite | 23.6 | 28% | 225 |
| 4 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.368Strong | 16.3 | 25% | 177 |
| 5 |  Quentin JohnstonWRLAC | 0.346Solid | 19.9 | 26% | 230 |
| 6 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 7 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.344Solid | 16.3 | 24% | 189 |
| 8 |  Rome OdunzeWR CHI | 0.337Solid | 19.9 | 27% | 236 |
| 9 |  Zay FlowersWR BAL | 0.323Solid | 15.2 | 31% | 188 |
| 10 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.318Solid | 19.0 | 37% | 239 |
| 11 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.299Rotational | 17.8 | 23% | 238 |
| 12 |  DK MetcalfWR PIT | 0.297Rotational | 14.8 | — | 199 |
| 13 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.297Rotational | 8.6 | — | 116 |
| 14 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.291Rotational | 18.8 | — | 258 |
| 15 |  Stefon DiggsWR NE | 0.286Rotational | 10.1 | — | 141 |
| 16 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.281Rotational | 15.6 | 25% | 222 |
| 17 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.280Rotational | 14.3 | 30% | 205 |
| 18 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.279Rotational | 15.5 | 27% | 222 |
| 19 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.276Rotational | 11.8 | — | 170 |
| 20 |  Courtland SuttonWRDEN | 0.275Rotational | 15.7 | — | 228 |
| 21 |  Tyquan ThorntonWR KC | 0.273Rotational | 11.6 | — | 169 |
| 22 |  Tre TuckerWR LV | 0.271Rotational | 15.8 | — | 234 |
| 23 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.270Rotational | 15.3 | 30% | 226 |
| 24 |  KaVontae TurpinWRDAL | 0.265Rotational | 8.8 | — | 133 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.545Elite
- PPR per game
- 27.4
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 201
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.437Elite
- PPR per game
- 17.8
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 163
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.420Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.6
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 225
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.368Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 177
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.346Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 230
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.344Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.3
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 189
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 236
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.323Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 188
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.318Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 37%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 239
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.8
- Target share
- 23%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 238
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.297Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 199
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.297Rotational
- PPR per game
- 8.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 116
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 258
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.286Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 141
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 222
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.280Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 205
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 222
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 170
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 228
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 169
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.271Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 234
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.270Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.3
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 226
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.265Rotational
- PPR per game
- 8.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 133
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →