Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 9, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–9 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.441Elite | 21.3 | 25% | 242 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | 25% | 155 |
| 3 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.366Strong | 12.7 | — | 277 |
| 4 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.354Strong | 19.3 | 31% | 218 |
| 5 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.350Strong | 14.0 | 27% | 281 |
| 6 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.349Solid | 19.7 | 33% | 451 |
| 7 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.349Solid | 13.9 | — | 239 |
| 8 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.345Solid | 18.9 | — | 492 |
| 9 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 10 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.344Solid | 5.8 | — | 135 |
| 11 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.342Solid | 16.2 | 30% | 237 |
| 12 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.338Solid | 14.8 | — | 394 |
| 13 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.338Solid | 14.4 | — | 385 |
| 14 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.326Solid | 18.5 | 28% | 455 |
| 15 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.320Solid | 17.1 | 32% | 267 |
| 16 |  Kalif RaymondWR DET | 0.317Solid | 6.2 | — | 156 |
| 17 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.316Solid | 13.6 | — | 302 |
| 18 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWRDET | 0.304Solid | 16.8 | 27% | 443 |
| 19 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.300Solid | 12.9 | 25% | 343 |
| 20 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.299Rotational | 15.1 | — | 455 |
| 21 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.299Rotational | 18.4 | 38% | 431 |
| 22 |  Quentin JohnstonWRLAC | 0.299Rotational | 11.8 | — | 237 |
| 23 |  Zay FlowersWR BAL | 0.295Rotational | 14.9 | 26% | 454 |
| 24 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.288Rotational | 17.4 | 30% | 544 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.441Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 242
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.366Strong
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 277
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.354Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.3
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 218
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.350Strong
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 281
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.349Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 451
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.349Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 239
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 492
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.344Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 135
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 237
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.338Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 394
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.338Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 385
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.326Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 455
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.1
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 267
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 6.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 156
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 302
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.8
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 443
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.300Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 343
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 455
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 431
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 237
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.9
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 454
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.288Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 544
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →