Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
Season-to-date2025 full season, Weeks 1–18Complete-to-date totals across the full season.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.516Elite | 23.4 | 30% | 727 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.434Elite | 21.2 | 37% | 829 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.362Strong | 18.8 | 29% | 415 |
| 4 |  Stefon DiggsWR NE | 0.352Strong | 12.4 | — | 598 |
| 5 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.351Strong | 15.9 | 25% | 635 |
| 6 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.345Solid | 19.1 | 32% | 939 |
| 7 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 8 |  DeMario DouglasWRNE | 0.333Solid | 5.6 | — | 288 |
| 9 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.318Solid | 19.6 | 32% | 987 |
| 10 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.318Solid | 8.5 | — | 402 |
| 11 |  Christian WatsonWR GB | 0.317Solid | 13.2 | — | 418 |
| 12 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.302Solid | 17.2 | — | 968 |
| 13 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.302Solid | 16.8 | 29% | 887 |
| 14 |  Luke McCaffreyWR WSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 15 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.291Rotational | 15.1 | 24% | 778 |
| 16 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.290Rotational | 10.7 | — | 630 |
| 17 |  Gunner OlszewskiWR NYG | 0.286Rotational | 2.1 | — | 118 |
| 18 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.285Rotational | 16.8 | 30% | 709 |
| 19 |  Jayden ReedWRGB | 0.285Rotational | 6.9 | — | 170 |
| 20 |  Zay FlowersWR BAL | 0.277Rotational | 14.3 | 30% | 879 |
| 21 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.275Rotational | 14.1 | — | 769 |
| 22 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.274Rotational | 14.3 | 24% | 732 |
| 23 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.268Rotational | 12.1 | 24% | 724 |
| 24 |  Deebo SamuelWRWSH | 0.264Rotational | 11.8 | 25% | 713 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.516Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.4
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 727
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.434Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.2
- Target share
- 37%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 829
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 415
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.352Strong
- PPR per game
- 12.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 598
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 635
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.1
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 939
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.333Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 288
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.318Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.6
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 987
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.318Solid
- PPR per game
- 8.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 402
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 418
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 968
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 887
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 778
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 630
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.286Rotational
- PPR per game
- 2.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 118
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 709
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 6.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 170
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.277Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 879
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 769
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 732
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.268Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.1
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 724
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.264Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.8
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 713
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →