Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
Season-to-date2024 full season, Weeks 1–18Complete-to-date totals across the full season.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.436Elite | 7.6 | — | 297 |
| 2 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.424Elite | 18.8 | 33% | 487 |
| 3 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.420Elite | 17.6 | — | 502 |
| 4 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | — | 155 |
| 5 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.382Strong | 23.7 | 27% | 1,054 |
| 6 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.358Strong | 17.2 | 25% | 671 |
| 7 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.349Solid | 18.5 | 26% | 636 |
| 8 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.346Solid | 16.7 | 26% | 821 |
| 9 |  Chris GodwinWRTB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 10 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.328Solid | 15.1 | — | 735 |
| 11 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.325Solid | 13.9 | — | 429 |
| 12 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.319Solid | 17.6 | 29% | 826 |
| 13 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.313Solid | 18.6 | 27% | 1,010 |
| 14 |  KaVontae TurpinWRDAL | 0.312Solid | 5.8 | — | 315 |
| 15 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.311Solid | 12.2 | — | 586 |
| 16 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.309Solid | 18.2 | 36% | 886 |
| 17 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.306Solid | 14.0 | 27% | 689 |
| 18 |  Davante AdamsWR NYJ | 0.305Solid | 17.2 | 30% | 792 |
| 19 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.305Solid | 13.1 | 26% | 602 |
| 20 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.304Solid | 18.7 | 30% | 1,043 |
| 21 |  Mecole HardmanWRKC | 0.289Rotational | 2.8 | — | 115 |
| 22 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.288Rotational | 11.6 | — | 685 |
| 23 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.286Rotational | 15.8 | — | 935 |
| 24 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.283Rotational | 16.7 | 34% | 766 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.436Elite
- PPR per game
- 7.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 297
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.424Elite
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 487
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.420Elite
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 502
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.382Strong
- PPR per game
- 23.7
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 1,054
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.358Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 671
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.349Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 636
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.346Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 821
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 735
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 429
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.319Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 826
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.313Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.6
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 1,010
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.312Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 315
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 586
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.2
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 886
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 689
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.305Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.2
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 792
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.305Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.1
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 602
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.7
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 1,043
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 2.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.288Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 685
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.286Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 935
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 766
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →