Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 5, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–5 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.508Elite | 26.8 | 35% | 264 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.452Elite | 19.7 | 34% | 218 |
| 3 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.409Elite | 22.5 | 31% | 275 |
| 4 |  Stefon DiggsWR NE | 0.380Strong | 13.0 | 26% | 171 |
| 5 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.377Strong | 17.7 | 29% | 235 |
| 6 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.353Strong | 20.5 | — | 290 |
| 7 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.351Strong | 15.2 | 25% | 216 |
| 8 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 9 |  Rome OdunzeWR CHI | 0.337Solid | 19.9 | 27% | 236 |
| 10 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.329Solid | 17.3 | 29% | 262 |
| 11 |  Zay FlowersWR BAL | 0.325Solid | 14.6 | 30% | 224 |
| 12 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.304Solid | 14.1 | — | 232 |
| 13 |  Quentin JohnstonWRLAC | 0.303Solid | 17.3 | 23% | 285 |
| 14 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.301Solid | 19.0 | 34% | 316 |
| 15 |  DK MetcalfWR PIT | 0.297Rotational | 14.8 | — | 199 |
| 16 |  Tyquan ThorntonWR KC | 0.294Rotational | 11.6 | — | 198 |
| 17 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.291Rotational | 17.7 | — | 305 |
| 18 |  Tory HortonWRSEA | 0.282Rotational | 7.7 | — | 136 |
| 19 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.280Rotational | 15.5 | 24% | 276 |
| 20 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.278Rotational | 14.0 | 25% | 252 |
| 21 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.276Rotational | 16.1 | 30% | 291 |
| 22 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.272Rotational | 11.6 | — | 213 |
| 23 |  Courtland SuttonWR DEN | 0.270Rotational | 16.1 | — | 298 |
| 24 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.270Rotational | 15.1 | 27% | 280 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.508Elite
- PPR per game
- 26.8
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 264
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.452Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 218
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.409Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.5
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 275
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.380Strong
- PPR per game
- 13.0
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 171
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.377Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.7
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 235
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.353Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 290
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 216
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 236
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.329Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.3
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 262
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 224
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 232
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.3
- Target share
- 23%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 285
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 316
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.297Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 199
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.294Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 198
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 305
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 7.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 136
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.280Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 276
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.278Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 252
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.1
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 291
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 213
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.270Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 298
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.270Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 280
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →