Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 17, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–17 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.517Elite | 23.3 | 30% | 675 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.448Elite | 21.6 | 37% | 772 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.362Strong | 18.8 | 29% | 415 |
| 4 |  Stefon DiggsWR NE | 0.356Strong | 12.7 | — | 571 |
| 5 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.351Strong | 15.9 | 25% | 635 |
| 6 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 7 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.344Solid | 18.7 | 31% | 870 |
| 8 |  DeMario DouglasWRNE | 0.333Solid | 5.7 | — | 273 |
| 9 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.327Solid | 8.6 | — | 368 |
| 10 |  Christian WatsonWR GB | 0.317Solid | 13.2 | — | 418 |
| 11 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.316Solid | 19.3 | 33% | 919 |
| 12 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.308Solid | 18.1 | 24% | 943 |
| 13 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.302Solid | 16.8 | 29% | 887 |
| 14 |  Jayden ReedWRGB | 0.299Rotational | 8.1 | — | 162 |
| 15 |  Luke McCaffreyWR WSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 16 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.291Rotational | 15.1 | 24% | 778 |
| 17 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.291Rotational | 10.8 | — | 592 |
| 18 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.283Rotational | 16.7 | 30% | 650 |
| 19 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.282Rotational | 15.3 | 25% | 707 |
| 20 |  Deebo SamuelWRWSH | 0.277Rotational | 12.3 | 25% | 664 |
| 21 |  Troy FranklinWR DEN | 0.275Rotational | 11.1 | — | 645 |
| 22 |  Jalen McMillanWR TB | 0.275Rotational | 9.3 | — | 101 |
| 23 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.272Rotational | 13.8 | — | 710 |
| 24 |  Terry McLaurinWRWSH | 0.271Rotational | 11.6 | — | 385 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.517Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.3
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 675
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.448Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.6
- Target share
- 37%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 772
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 415
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.356Strong
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 571
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 635
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.344Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.7
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 870
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.333Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 273
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.327Solid
- PPR per game
- 8.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 368
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 418
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.3
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 919
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.1
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 943
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 887
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 8.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 162
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 778
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 592
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 650
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 707
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.277Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 664
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 645
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 101
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 710
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.271Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 385
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →