Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 16, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–16 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.532Elite | 23.8 | 30% | 627 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.462Elite | 22.0 | 37% | 713 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.362Strong | 18.8 | 29% | 415 |
| 4 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.351Strong | 15.9 | 25% | 635 |
| 5 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.348Solid | 19.0 | 30% | 817 |
| 6 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 7 |  Stefon DiggsWR NE | 0.337Solid | 12.1 | — | 537 |
| 8 |  DeMario DouglasWRNE | 0.337Solid | 5.9 | — | 264 |
| 9 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.322Solid | 18.5 | 25% | 863 |
| 10 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.308Solid | 18.9 | 33% | 860 |
| 11 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.306Solid | 18.3 | 32% | 598 |
| 12 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.305Solid | 11.3 | — | 556 |
| 13 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.303Solid | 15.8 | 25% | 627 |
| 14 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.296Rotational | 15.5 | 25% | 734 |
| 15 |  Luke McCaffreyWR WSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 16 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.295Rotational | 8.1 | — | 137 |
| 17 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.289Rotational | 16.1 | 28% | 838 |
| 18 |  Christian WatsonWRGB | 0.283Rotational | 12.2 | — | 389 |
| 19 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.281Rotational | 7.1 | — | 330 |
| 20 |  Troy FranklinWR DEN | 0.277Rotational | 11.4 | — | 618 |
| 21 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.275Rotational | 14.1 | — | 666 |
| 22 |  Deebo SamuelWRWSH | 0.275Rotational | 12.3 | 26% | 628 |
| 23 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.272Rotational | 12.9 | 25% | 710 |
| 24 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.272Rotational | 10.5 | — | 576 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.532Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 627
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.462Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.0
- Target share
- 37%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 713
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 415
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 635
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.348Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 817
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 537
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 264
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.322Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 863
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 860
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.3
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 598
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.305Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 556
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 627
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.296Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 734
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 8.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 137
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.1
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 838
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 389
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 7.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 330
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.277Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 618
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 666
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.3
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 628
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 710
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 576
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →