Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 15, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–15 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.517Elite | 22.1 | 30% | 555 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.472Elite | 21.8 | 36% | 648 |
| 3 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.369Strong | 19.6 | 31% | 745 |
| 4 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.362Strong | 18.8 | 29% | 415 |
| 5 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.351Strong | 15.9 | 25% | 635 |
| 6 |  DeMario DouglasWR NE | 0.348Solid | 6.2 | — | 251 |
| 7 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 8 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.325Solid | 19.7 | 33% | 545 |
| 9 |  Stefon DiggsWRNE | 0.321Solid | 11.3 | — | 493 |
| 10 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.311Solid | 18.0 | 24% | 812 |
| 11 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.310Solid | 16.3 | 25% | 577 |
| 12 |  Christian WatsonWR GB | 0.309Solid | 13.3 | — | 344 |
| 13 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.304Solid | 18.9 | 33% | 807 |
| 14 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.304Solid | 16.0 | 25% | 682 |
| 15 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.304Solid | 11.4 | — | 526 |
| 16 |  Luke McCaffreyWR WSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 17 |  Deebo SamuelWRWSH | 0.285Rotational | 12.8 | 26% | 584 |
| 18 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.281Rotational | 7.1 | — | 330 |
| 19 |  Terry McLaurinWRWSH | 0.281Rotational | 12.1 | — | 302 |
| 20 |  Troy FranklinWR DEN | 0.279Rotational | 11.5 | — | 576 |
| 21 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.271Rotational | 12.9 | 25% | 668 |
| 22 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.271Rotational | 10.7 | — | 552 |
| 23 |  Hollywood BrownWRKC | 0.270Rotational | 9.3 | — | 449 |
| 24 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.269Rotational | 14.1 | — | 628 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.517Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.1
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 555
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.472Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 648
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.369Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.6
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 745
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 415
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 635
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.348Solid
- PPR per game
- 6.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 251
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 545
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.321Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 493
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.0
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 812
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 577
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 344
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 807
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.0
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 682
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 526
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 584
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 7.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 330
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 302
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 576
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.271Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 668
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.271Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 552
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.270Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 449
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 628
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →