Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 14, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–14 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.503Elite | 21.6 | 30% | 515 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.485Elite | 22.1 | 37% | 593 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.380Strong | 19.7 | 28% | 363 |
| 4 |  DeMario DouglasWR NE | 0.360Strong | 6.7 | — | 241 |
| 5 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.352Strong | 16.3 | 25% | 602 |
| 6 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 7 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.341Solid | 18.0 | 30% | 684 |
| 8 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.327Solid | 18.9 | 25% | 752 |
| 9 |  Stefon DiggsWRNE | 0.327Solid | 11.7 | — | 467 |
| 10 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.325Solid | 19.7 | 33% | 545 |
| 11 |  Christian WatsonWR GB | 0.317Solid | 14.4 | — | 317 |
| 12 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.313Solid | 16.2 | 25% | 517 |
| 13 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.304Solid | 11.6 | — | 498 |
| 14 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.303Solid | 18.5 | 32% | 733 |
| 15 |  Luke McCaffreyWR WSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 16 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.291Rotational | 15.3 | 26% | 633 |
| 17 |  Deebo SamuelWRWSH | 0.291Rotational | 13.3 | 26% | 547 |
| 18 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.282Rotational | 13.6 | 25% | 626 |
| 19 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.274Rotational | 10.6 | — | 504 |
| 20 |  Hollywood BrownWRKC | 0.270Rotational | 9.3 | — | 449 |
| 21 |  Terry McLaurinWRWSH | 0.270Rotational | 11.5 | — | 256 |
| 22 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.269Rotational | 14.1 | — | 628 |
| 23 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.264Rotational | 14.3 | 27% | 216 |
| 24 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.262Rotational | 14.1 | — | 699 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.503Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 515
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.485Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.1
- Target share
- 37%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 593
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.380Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 363
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.360Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 241
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.352Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 602
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.341Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.0
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 684
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.327Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 752
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.327Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 467
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 545
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 317
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.313Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 517
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 498
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 733
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.3
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 633
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 547
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 626
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 504
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.270Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 449
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.270Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 256
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 628
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.264Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 216
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.262Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 699
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →