Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 7, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–7 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.441Elite | 21.3 | 25% | 242 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | 25% | 155 |
| 3 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.378Strong | 19.9 | 33% | 105 |
| 4 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.371Strong | 19.7 | — | 372 |
| 5 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.369Strong | 22.1 | 36% | 180 |
| 6 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.357Strong | 11.8 | — | 198 |
| 7 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.354Strong | 19.4 | 33% | 329 |
| 8 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.354Strong | 15.5 | — | 307 |
| 9 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.353Strong | 15.6 | — | 309 |
| 10 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.349Solid | 13.9 | — | 239 |
| 11 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.348Solid | 6.0 | — | 104 |
| 12 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 13 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.342Solid | 16.2 | 30% | 237 |
| 14 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.335Solid | 19.9 | 38% | 298 |
| 15 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.316Solid | 13.6 | — | 302 |
| 16 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.309Solid | 17.9 | 28% | 348 |
| 17 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.307Solid | 12.8 | 25% | 209 |
| 18 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.288Rotational | 14.7 | 26% | 356 |
| 19 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.282Rotational | 17.6 | 27% | 436 |
| 20 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.279Rotational | 13.3 | 25% | 286 |
| 21 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.278Rotational | 15.6 | 24% | 393 |
| 22 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.277Rotational | 5.5 | — | 119 |
| 23 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.275Rotational | 15.4 | 26% | 336 |
| 24 |  Allen LazardWR NYJ | 0.261Rotational | 14.5 | — | 388 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.441Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 242
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.378Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 105
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.371Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 372
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.369Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.1
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 180
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.357Strong
- PPR per game
- 11.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 198
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.354Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 329
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.354Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 307
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.353Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 309
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.349Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 239
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.348Solid
- PPR per game
- 6.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 104
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 237
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.335Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 298
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 302
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.9
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 348
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.307Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 209
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.288Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.7
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 356
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 436
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 286
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.278Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 393
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.277Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 119
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 336
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.261Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 388
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →