Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 6, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–6 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.441Elite | 21.3 | — | 242 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | — | 155 |
| 3 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.399Strong | 17.7 | — | 266 |
| 4 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.378Strong | 20.7 | 30% | 329 |
| 5 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.378Strong | 19.9 | 33% | 105 |
| 6 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.375Strong | 22.9 | 40% | 244 |
| 7 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.372Strong | 20.1 | — | 324 |
| 8 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.367Strong | 15.7 | 28% | 171 |
| 9 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.360Strong | 23.3 | 36% | 129 |
| 10 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.357Strong | 11.4 | — | 160 |
| 11 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.351Strong | 19.0 | 34% | 271 |
| 12 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.349Solid | 13.9 | — | 239 |
| 13 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.348Solid | 6.0 | — | 104 |
| 14 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.328Solid | 15.7 | 29% | 192 |
| 15 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.325Solid | 14.5 | — | 267 |
| 16 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.308Solid | 14.3 | — | 279 |
| 17 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.299Rotational | 17.0 | — | 341 |
| 18 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.283Rotational | 14.5 | 26% | 307 |
| 19 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.282Rotational | 17.5 | 27% | 371 |
| 20 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.282Rotational | 7.5 | — | 133 |
| 21 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.280Rotational | 16.4 | 28% | 294 |
| 22 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.279Rotational | 13.3 | — | 286 |
| 23 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.275Rotational | 15.4 | 26% | 336 |
| 24 |  Xavier WorthyWRKC | 0.269Rotational | 11.6 | — | 216 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.441Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 242
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.399Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 266
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.378Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.7
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 329
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.378Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 105
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.375Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.9
- Target share
- 40%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 244
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.372Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 324
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.367Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 171
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.360Strong
- PPR per game
- 23.3
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 129
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.357Strong
- PPR per game
- 11.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 160
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 271
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.349Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 239
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.348Solid
- PPR per game
- 6.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 104
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 192
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 267
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 279
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 341
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 307
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.5
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 371
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 7.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 133
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.280Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.4
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 294
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 286
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 336
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 216
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →