Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 2, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–2 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.393Strong | 22.6 | 28% | 115 |
| 2 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.378Strong | 19.9 | 33% | 105 |
| 3 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.333Solid | 20.1 | 43% | 121 |
| 4 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WR SF | 0.325Solid | 18.4 | 33% | 113 |
| 5 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.320Solid | 16.3 | 25% | 102 |
| 6 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.317Solid | 16.3 | 26% | 103 |
| 7 |  Davante AdamsWR LV | 0.315Solid | 18.4 | 26% | 117 |
| 8 |  Calvin RidleyWR TEN | 0.303Solid | 16.4 | — | 108 |
| 9 |  Marvin Harrison Jr.WR ARI | 0.301Solid | 15.2 | — | 101 |
| 10 |  Jameson WilliamsWR DET | 0.298Rotational | 19.4 | 26% | 130 |
| 11 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.290Rotational | 17.4 | — | 120 |
| 12 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.267Rotational | 14.8 | — | 111 |
| 13 |  Zay FlowersWR BAL | 0.257Rotational | 16.6 | 31% | 129 |
| 14 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWRSEA | 0.249Rotational | 13.8 | — | 111 |
| 15 |  DeVonta SmithWR PHI | 0.245Rotational | 18.0 | 31% | 147 |
| 16 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.233Rotational | 12.3 | — | 106 |
| 17 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.213Rotational | 11.1 | 29% | 104 |
| 18 |  Andrei IosivasWR CIN | 0.203Rotational | 10.2 | — | 100 |
| 19 |  Jerry JeudyWR CLE | 0.200Rotational | 11.9 | — | 119 |
| 20 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWRDET | 0.196Rotational | 13.6 | 28% | 139 |
| 21 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWRCIN | 0.193Rotational | 9.8 | — | 102 |
| 22 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.182Rotational | 10.4 | — | 115 |
| 23 |  DJ MooreWR CHI | 0.181Rotational | 10.7 | 28% | 118 |
| 24 |  Darnell MooneyWRATL | 0.178Rotational | 10.2 | — | 114 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.393Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.6
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.378Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 105
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.333Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.1
- Target share
- 43%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 121
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 113
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 102
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.3
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 103
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.315Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 117
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 108
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 101
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.298Rotational
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 130
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 120
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.267Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 111
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.257Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 129
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.249Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 111
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.245Rotational
- PPR per game
- 18.0
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 147
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.233Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 106
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.213Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.1
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 104
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.203Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 100
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.200Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 119
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.196Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 139
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.193Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 102
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.182Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.181Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 118
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.178Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 114
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →