Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 17, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–17 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.424Elite | 18.8 | 33% | 487 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | — | 155 |
| 3 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.399Strong | 17.8 | 25% | 491 |
| 4 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.392Strong | 6.7 | — | 274 |
| 5 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.385Strong | 23.6 | 27% | 981 |
| 6 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.364Strong | 17.1 | — | 612 |
| 7 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.363Strong | 19.3 | 28% | 586 |
| 8 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.351Strong | 16.7 | — | 759 |
| 9 |  Chris GodwinWRTB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 10 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.344Solid | 14.5 | — | 378 |
| 11 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.328Solid | 15.0 | 25% | 684 |
| 12 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.324Solid | 5.6 | — | 276 |
| 13 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.319Solid | 17.6 | 29% | 826 |
| 14 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.317Solid | 18.9 | 27% | 955 |
| 15 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.316Solid | 19.3 | 31% | 979 |
| 16 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.311Solid | 12.2 | — | 586 |
| 17 |  Derius DavisWRLAC | 0.310Solid | 2.8 | — | 125 |
| 18 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.302Solid | 18.3 | 36% | 849 |
| 19 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.302Solid | 12.6 | 26% | 543 |
| 20 |  Davante AdamsWR NYJ | 0.301Solid | 17.0 | 29% | 733 |
| 21 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.300Solid | 12.0 | — | 640 |
| 22 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.299Rotational | 14.2 | 27% | 664 |
| 23 |  Mecole HardmanWRKC | 0.289Rotational | 2.8 | — | 115 |
| 24 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.283Rotational | 16.7 | 34% | 766 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.424Elite
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 487
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.399Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.8
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 491
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.392Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 274
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.385Strong
- PPR per game
- 23.6
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 981
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.364Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 612
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.363Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.3
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 586
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 759
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.344Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 378
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 684
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.324Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 276
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.319Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 826
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.9
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 955
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.3
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 979
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 586
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 2.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 125
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.3
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 849
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 543
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 733
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.300Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 640
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 664
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 2.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 766
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →