Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 16, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–16 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.424Elite | 18.4 | 31% | 433 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | 25% | 155 |
| 3 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.414Elite | 18.7 | 26% | 451 |
| 4 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.401Elite | 23.9 | 27% | 893 |
| 5 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.350Strong | 5.7 | — | 243 |
| 6 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 7 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.342Solid | 16.2 | — | 710 |
| 8 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.342Solid | 16.1 | — | 564 |
| 9 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.330Solid | 17.3 | 28% | 524 |
| 10 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.326Solid | 12.6 | — | 543 |
| 11 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.320Solid | 19.5 | 31% | 911 |
| 12 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.320Solid | 12.7 | — | 595 |
| 13 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.320Solid | 13.2 | 27% | 496 |
| 14 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.319Solid | 17.6 | 29% | 826 |
| 15 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.314Solid | 18.8 | 27% | 899 |
| 16 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.314Solid | 5.1 | — | 246 |
| 17 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.313Solid | 13.9 | 25% | 623 |
| 18 |  Davante AdamsWR NYJ | 0.308Solid | 17.6 | 30% | 685 |
| 19 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.306Solid | 14.2 | 26% | 604 |
| 20 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.302Solid | 16.4 | — | 814 |
| 21 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.302Solid | 12.8 | — | 338 |
| 22 |  Cooper KuppWRLAR | 0.290Rotational | 15.6 | 26% | 589 |
| 23 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.289Rotational | 17.0 | 34% | 707 |
| 24 |  Mecole HardmanWRKC | 0.289Rotational | 2.8 | — | 115 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.424Elite
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 433
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.414Elite
- PPR per game
- 18.7
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 451
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.401Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.9
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 893
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.350Strong
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 243
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 710
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 564
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.330Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.3
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 524
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.326Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 543
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.5
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 911
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 595
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 496
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.319Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 826
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 899
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 246
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.313Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 623
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 685
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 604
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 814
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 338
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 589
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 707
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 2.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →