Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 11, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–11 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.427Elite | 19.3 | — | 272 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | 25% | 155 |
| 3 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.388Strong | 14.5 | — | 187 |
| 4 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.387Strong | 22.9 | 25% | 650 |
| 5 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.386Strong | 6.4 | — | 166 |
| 6 |  Cooper KuppWRLAR | 0.380Strong | 20.1 | 29% | 318 |
| 7 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.362Strong | 18.5 | 30% | 306 |
| 8 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.354Strong | 14.7 | 26% | 373 |
| 9 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.350Strong | 15.6 | 26% | 357 |
| 10 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 11 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.340Solid | 14.3 | — | 420 |
| 12 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.336Solid | 19.1 | 29% | 570 |
| 13 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.336Solid | 12.8 | — | 382 |
| 14 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.316Solid | 13.6 | — | 302 |
| 15 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.314Solid | 13.3 | — | 468 |
| 16 |  Mecole HardmanWRKC | 0.308Solid | 3.2 | — | 103 |
| 17 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.307Solid | 17.5 | 29% | 571 |
| 18 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.302Solid | 18.1 | 32% | 601 |
| 19 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.293Rotational | 12.8 | — | 438 |
| 20 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.292Rotational | 16.1 | 32% | 386 |
| 21 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.283Rotational | 15.2 | 24% | 431 |
| 22 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.281Rotational | 17.4 | 37% | 497 |
| 23 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.279Rotational | 13.3 | 25% | 286 |
| 24 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.276Rotational | 14.0 | — | 559 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.427Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 272
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.388Strong
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 187
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.387Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 650
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.386Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 166
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.380Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.1
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 318
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 306
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.354Strong
- PPR per game
- 14.7
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 373
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.350Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 357
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.340Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 420
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.336Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.1
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 570
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.336Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 382
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 302
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 468
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 3.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 103
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.307Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.5
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 571
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.1
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 601
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.293Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 438
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.1
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 386
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 431
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 37%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 497
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 286
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 559
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →