Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 10, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–10 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.441Elite | 21.3 | 25% | 242 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | 25% | 155 |
| 3 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.396Strong | 22.5 | 25% | 569 |
| 4 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.346Solid | 14.1 | 27% | 325 |
| 5 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 6 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.343Solid | 12.6 | — | 330 |
| 7 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.342Solid | 16.2 | 30% | 237 |
| 8 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.338Solid | 14.8 | — | 394 |
| 9 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.336Solid | 14.2 | — | 297 |
| 10 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.328Solid | 18.4 | 28% | 281 |
| 11 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.325Solid | 5.2 | — | 143 |
| 12 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.320Solid | 16.9 | 32% | 317 |
| 13 |  Puka NacuaWRLAR | 0.319Solid | 11.8 | — | 148 |
| 14 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.316Solid | 18.6 | 32% | 529 |
| 15 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.316Solid | 13.6 | — | 302 |
| 16 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.315Solid | 13.3 | — | 423 |
| 17 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.310Solid | 17.4 | 29% | 505 |
| 18 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.301Solid | 17.0 | 28% | 507 |
| 19 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.297Rotational | 15.2 | — | 512 |
| 20 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.287Rotational | 5.5 | — | 172 |
| 21 |  Quentin JohnstonWR LAC | 0.284Rotational | 11.6 | — | 286 |
| 22 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.283Rotational | 15.2 | — | 431 |
| 23 |  Ladd McConkeyWRLAC | 0.283Rotational | 12.2 | — | 389 |
| 24 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.281Rotational | 17.4 | 37% | 497 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.441Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 242
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.396Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.5
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 569
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.346Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 325
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.343Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 330
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 237
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.338Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 394
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.336Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 297
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 281
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 143
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.9
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 317
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.319Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 148
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.6
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 529
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 302
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.315Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 423
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 505
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 507
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.297Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 512
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.287Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 172
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 286
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 431
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 389
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 37%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 497
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →