Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 7, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–7 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.477Elite | 23.1 | 31% | 291 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.475Elite | 22.1 | 39% | 326 |
| 3 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.381Strong | 21.0 | 32% | 385 |
| 4 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.372Strong | 21.4 | 32% | 402 |
| 5 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.370Strong | 15.9 | 24% | 301 |
| 6 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.358Strong | 6.0 | — | 100 |
| 7 |  Stefon DiggsWR NE | 0.347Solid | 12.1 | 25% | 244 |
| 8 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 9 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.333Solid | 15.7 | 28% | 282 |
| 10 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.326Solid | 19.0 | — | 407 |
| 11 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.315Solid | 16.7 | — | 370 |
| 12 |  Luke McCaffreyWRWSH | 0.312Solid | 6.6 | — | 147 |
| 13 |  Hollywood BrownWR KC | 0.311Solid | 12.5 | — | 282 |
| 14 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.306Solid | 15.1 | — | 197 |
| 15 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.303Solid | 15.7 | 27% | 363 |
| 16 |  DK MetcalfWR PIT | 0.285Rotational | 14.4 | — | 304 |
| 17 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.285Rotational | 8.4 | — | 207 |
| 18 |  Jordan AddisonWR MIN | 0.281Rotational | 17.4 | — | 186 |
| 19 |  Quentin JohnstonWRLAC | 0.276Rotational | 16.2 | — | 353 |
| 20 |  Zay FlowersWR BAL | 0.276Rotational | 13.6 | 30% | 295 |
| 21 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.274Rotational | 12.7 | — | 324 |
| 22 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.273Rotational | 16.6 | 38% | 364 |
| 23 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.270Rotational | 14.6 | — | 378 |
| 24 |  DeVonta SmithWR PHI | 0.267Rotational | 14.3 | 25% | 376 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.477Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.1
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 291
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.475Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.1
- Target share
- 39%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 326
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.381Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.0
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 385
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.372Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.4
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 402
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.370Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.9
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 301
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.358Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 100
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.347Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.1
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 244
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.333Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 282
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.326Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 407
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.315Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 370
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.312Solid
- PPR per game
- 6.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 147
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 282
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 197
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 363
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 304
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 8.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 207
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 186
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 353
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 295
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 324
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 364
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.270Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 378
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.267Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 376
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →