Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 2, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–2 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.422Elite | 23.9 | 28% | 113 |
| 2 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.383Strong | 24.9 | 35% | 130 |
| 3 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.370Strong | 20.6 | 30% | 111 |
| 4 |  Rome OdunzeWR CHI | 0.363Strong | 23.8 | 30% | 131 |
| 5 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.348Solid | 20.0 | 27% | 115 |
| 6 |  Davante AdamsWR LAR | 0.308Solid | 15.8 | 35% | 103 |
| 7 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.292Rotational | 15.8 | 41% | 108 |
| 8 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.285Rotational | 18.3 | — | 128 |
| 9 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.277Rotational | 19.1 | 30% | 138 |
| 10 |  Hollywood BrownWR KC | 0.274Rotational | 13.9 | 30% | 102 |
| 11 |  Keon ColemanWR BUF | 0.273Rotational | 15.4 | — | 113 |
| 12 |  Dyami BrownWR JAX | 0.254Rotational | 13.2 | — | 104 |
| 13 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.254Rotational | 12.9 | 32% | 102 |
| 14 |  Kayshon BoutteWR NE | 0.247Rotational | 12.4 | — | 101 |
| 15 |  Jakobi MeyersWR LV | 0.246Rotational | 15.3 | 29% | 124 |
| 16 |  Hunter RenfrowWR CAR | 0.242Rotational | 13.4 | — | 111 |
| 17 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.235Rotational | 14.0 | — | 119 |
| 18 |  Tetairoa McMillanWRCAR | 0.222Rotational | 13.9 | — | 125 |
| 19 |  Jameson WilliamsWRDET | 0.217Rotational | 12.7 | — | 117 |
| 20 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.215Rotational | 12.3 | — | 114 |
| 21 |  DK MetcalfWR PIT | 0.214Rotational | 11.7 | — | 109 |
| 22 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.210Rotational | 11.8 | — | 112 |
| 23 |  Marvin Harrison Jr.WR ARI | 0.207Rotational | 11.4 | — | 110 |
| 24 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.207Rotational | 10.4 | — | 101 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.422Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.9
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 113
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.383Strong
- PPR per game
- 24.9
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 130
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.370Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 111
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.363Strong
- PPR per game
- 23.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 131
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.348Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.0
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 103
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- 41%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 108
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 18.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 128
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.277Rotational
- PPR per game
- 19.1
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 138
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 102
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 113
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.254Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 104
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.254Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.9
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 102
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.247Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 101
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.246Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.3
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 124
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.242Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 111
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.235Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 119
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.222Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 125
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.217Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 117
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.215Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 114
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.214Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 109
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.210Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 112
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.207Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 110
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.207Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 101
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →