Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 13, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–13 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.472Elite | 21.6 | 37% | 549 |
| 2 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.461Elite | 20.3 | 30% | 484 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.417Elite | 21.8 | 28% | 313 |
| 4 |  DeMario DouglasWR NE | 0.360Strong | 6.7 | — | 241 |
| 5 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.358Strong | 17.1 | 26% | 572 |
| 6 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.348Solid | 18.2 | 30% | 627 |
| 7 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.347Solid | 19.8 | 25% | 683 |
| 8 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 9 |  Stefon DiggsWRNE | 0.327Solid | 11.7 | — | 467 |
| 10 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.325Solid | 19.7 | 33% | 545 |
| 11 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.321Solid | 12.2 | — | 456 |
| 12 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.315Solid | 19.2 | 33% | 673 |
| 13 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.300Solid | 16.0 | 26% | 479 |
| 14 |  Luke McCaffreyWR WSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 15 |  Deebo SamuelWRWSH | 0.293Rotational | 13.8 | 25% | 520 |
| 16 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.292Rotational | 15.3 | 25% | 576 |
| 17 |  Christian WatsonWR GB | 0.277Rotational | 12.6 | — | 273 |
| 18 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.276Rotational | 13.2 | 24% | 575 |
| 19 |  Terry McLaurinWRWSH | 0.276Rotational | 12.4 | — | 224 |
| 20 |  Hollywood BrownWRKC | 0.274Rotational | 9.7 | — | 427 |
| 21 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.272Rotational | 10.7 | — | 472 |
| 22 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.269Rotational | 14.9 | 28% | 665 |
| 23 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.265Rotational | 6.1 | — | 254 |
| 24 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.264Rotational | 14.3 | 27% | 216 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.472Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.6
- Target share
- 37%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 549
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.461Elite
- PPR per game
- 20.3
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 484
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.417Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 313
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.360Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 241
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.358Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.1
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 572
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.348Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.2
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 627
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.347Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.8
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 683
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.327Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 467
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 545
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.321Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 456
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.315Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.2
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 673
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.300Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.0
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 479
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.293Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 520
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 576
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.277Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 273
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 575
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 224
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 427
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 472
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.9
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 665
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.265Rotational
- PPR per game
- 6.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 254
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.264Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 216
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →